Tell the scientists the brain measurements mean nothing, not me,djones do you read my post? you distorted my sentence to fill your (.....) fill the blank with what you want.....
This is my COMPLETE sentence:
« Brain measurements means nothing without a CORRELATION with a perception if we speak about hearing...»
Then i expect apology from you for your mistake in citation, or perhaps it is not a mistake but a tactic ?
After that "mistake" citing my post, you go on repeating what i just said like if i was not saying it in the first place.... i called this a CORRELATION and for sure a correlation must be between brain measure and hearing phenomenon ...
The main point was the ability to image the brain in order to understand the regions associated with the phenomenon.Finally you ended with the strawman usual fallacy of saying a common place evident fact erroneously SUGGESTING that i was refusing it....NOBODY REFUSE MEASUREMENTS....NOBODY REFUSE USEFUL TOOL....
IT IS NOT THE POINT...
THE POINT IS MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT ENOUGH.....they must be interpreted and they cannot be interpreted without a model but they cannot be used to successfully reduce hearing phenomenon to only one temporary model.... Map is not reality....
Psychoacoustic cannot be reduced to physical acoustic.... Even with an A.I. simulation.... Save for transhumanist cultist....
Is it more clear with big letters?