The "Very Best Record Cleaning Formulation"


The "Very Best Record Cleaning Formulation"

 

I am providing this formulation for all who are interested in the very best, and can be proven and demonstrated to be the "Very Best". It can easily be made from available ingredients. On the surface, it appears to be very simple. However, it is based on extensive complex chemistry along with precise mathematical calculations and verifiable data.

 

You may use it with absolute confidence and be truly assured that it is beyond doubt the "Very Best". You may use it for your personal needs. Or, archival entities may use it for their purposes with confidence. Or, you may choose to start an enterprise that makes and packages quantities as either a "ready-to-use" or a "Semi-concentrated" version for sale and distribution knowing that nothing better exists. You have my blessings and encouragement with one condition. And, that is, that the pricing represents a "fair margin", and, not an obscene gouging, typical for such products.

 

Initially, I had prepared a presentation that briefly introduced myself, and provided the thought processes, design parameters, and the necessary basics of chemistry, physics, and mathematics to assure you and allow you to be absolutely confident in this formulation. I made a considerable effort to keep it as simple, but, also as thorough enough to achieve this confidence. However, that presentation entailed 5,239 words, typical of such a requirement, however, unacceptable in length by this website forum.

 

I have no option other than to offer the formulation as a 100% parts by weight version suitable to produce 1 Kilogram of the cleaner, and, invite you to question me about any aspect of the formulation.

 

Professionally, I am a Chemist, more specifically a Polyurethane Chemist. I have a Doctorate in Chemistry as well as two other Doctorates and a M.B.A.. I held prominent positions in significant corporations before being encouraged to start our (wife and I) manufacturing facility servicing those I previously worked for. We started, owned, and fully operated this business. We eventually obtained 85+% Market Share in our sector in Medical, Automotive, Sporting Goods, and Footwear areas before retirement.

 

The Audio Industry is extremely technical and many brilliant minds have contributed their talents over the decades in order that we may enjoy music today as we choose. Like many other technical industries, those of lesser minds and values invade the arena with their "magical" inspired revelations and offer their "magical" ingredients and items to all at extremely high prices. They promise that if only we are willing to part with our money - they can provide these items to you that make your audio system sound as if the orchestra, or vocalist, is in your room with you. And, after all, "magical items" must be expensive, otherwise, they would not be "magical".

 

This disturbs me enormously, and, it is for such reasons, I feel compelled to provide realistic and truthful information that conforms to basic Engineering, Chemistry, Physics, and Mathematical Principals in those areas with which I am very knowledgeable and familiar.

 

          "Ultimate Record Cleaner Solution"

 

   Ingredient                                          Amount by Weight (Grams)

 

Distilled Water                                     779.962

 

Ethyl Alcohol                                       220.000

 

Tergitol 15-S-7 (Dow Chemical)            0.038  (Approx. = 2 Drops)

                                                         1,000.000

 

Important and/or Relevant Criteria

 

1.)  Distilled Water ONLY. Do not use deionized, tap, rain, or spring water. Distilled Water is readily available in most grocery stores. Check labeling to be certain that it is distilled and not deionized. The pricing is comparable.

 

2.)  Ethanol must be purchased at a "Liquor Store" or a "Liquor Control Board" that is suitable for human consumption, and the appropriate taxes must be paid. This assures that the alcohol consists of only Ethyl Alcohol and water. You need to purchase the 95+% version, also known as 180+ Proof. NOTHING ELSE is acceptable. (100% Ethyl Alcohol is not available under "normal" circumstances). Denatured alcohol from a Hardware Store or elsewhere is PROHIBITED, as well as ANY other alcohols.

 

3.)  Tergitol 15-S-7 is made by Dow and is available on the internet in small quantities from Laboratory Supply Houses such as Fisher and Advance, etc.. I have no affiliations with either Dow Chemical, or Fisher, or Advance. You MUST use Tergitol 15-S-7 ONLY. No other Tergitol product is acceptable for this designed formula, and you need to acquire the undiluted form only.

 

4.)  The above cleaner formula will result in a non-foaming (VLF) Surfactant Formulation that exhibits the following:

            Surface Tension of 28.5 dynes/centimeter @ 20 C. (68.0 F.)

            Surface Tension of 28.2 dynes/centimeter @ 25 C. (77.0 F.)

 

5.). A Surface Tension of 28.5 dynes/centimeter is Remarkable and will properly clean records of all organic soilings, and all oily substances, as well as very significant amounts of inorganic soilings.  This available Surface Tension coupled with the Azeotropic Characteristics of very rapid evaporation and spotless drying occur because of the selection of Ethyl Alcohol and the very specific concentration determined as 22.00% p.b.w., further improves the products abilities.  The "Ease-of-Use" and "Spot-Free" results are to be accepted.

 

6.). Be aware that an "ideal temperature of use" also exists for this formulation.  And, that reasonable temperature is 40 C. (104.0 F.). Further increases in temperature offers no improvement, therefore, confirming the proper use of the term "ideal". I mention this not because of of any substantial improvement, but, only to be aware of its’ existence. And, if you have a choice to utilize a room that is warmer than another, select the warmer room closer to 104.0 F. There is no need to elevate the temperature of the records or the materials. Simply be aware that 104.0 F. Is ideal.

 

If interest is expressed in this submission, I am willing to provide additional submissions regarding other materials, and, other areas of interest.  Such as"Best Contact Substance", "Best lubricants for turntables", " Better Dampening Materials" for turntables and tonearms, and, most significantly, "Best" material for "Turntable Platter/Vinyl Record Interface" usually called "Record Mats". The last item will certainly disturb many individuals and anger many suppliers.

 

Whatever I may contribute is substantiated by Science and Testing, and Verifiable. Science has no Opinions. Opinions in these matters are best reserved for those who rely on their imagination and wishful thinking.

 

Also, I have no vested interests in this Industry. Simply possess some scientific knowledge that also relates to some aspects of the Audio Area, and I am willing to share that information if requested!

128x128wizzzard
Post removed 

        

@mijostyn   

 

       @drkingfish  @recklesskelly   @whart ​​@lewm 

 

I initially thought it would be best to resolve the selection of ethanol and the specific concentration of 22.000% before discussing other matters.  And, I thought the best and easiest way was to prepare a very accurate and detailed graphs demonstrating the transition points.  One being extremely significant and the others less so important.

 

And, that is exactly what I had done, however, I am unable to post this graph or a pdf.  I contacted the Administrator on how to proceed, however, I have not as yet received a response.  So, I am going to ask you to prepare your own graphs on either graph paper, or quadrille paper, or a simple sheet of 8.5 x 11 paper.  I will provide you with only the 4 key points and describe how to prepare the graph to see the significant slopes related to the 22.000% value.

 

If you choose the 11 inch vertical side as you y-axis representing the Surface Tension at 20 degrees C and expressed as dynes per centimeter into 75 segments, and then select the horizontal 8.5 inch bottom to represent the x-axis indicating the percentage of Ethanol from 0% to 95.6% at 20 degrees C in parts by weight into 100 segments, we can begin.

 

At 0.00% Ethanol on the x-axis, the corresponding Surface Tension is:  72.72 dynes per centimeter on the y-axis.

 

At 22.00% Ethanol on the x-axis, the corresponding Surface Tension is:  30.28 dynes per centimeter on the y-axis.

 

At 41.50% Ethanol on the x-axis, the corresponding Surface Tension is:  27.59 dynes per centimeter on the y-axis.

 

At 95.60% Ethanol on the x-axis, the corresponding Surface Tension is:  26.63 dynes per centimeter on the y-axis.

 

(I will explain the reason why the values are to two decimal places rather than my original three decimal formulation a bit later).

 

You can immediately see the very steep slope between 0.00% Ethanol concentration and the 22.00% concentration.  At 41.50% Ethanol you notice a slight decline, and, at 95.60% the additional decline is even less significant.  Many people, would have considered only one   inflection point, but, I choose not to deviate from established mathematical guidelines.

 

From 0.00% Ethanol to 22.00% represents a drop in Surface Tension of a phenomenal 42.44 dynes per centimeter.

Going to than 41.50% represents a rather meaningless drop of only an additional 2.70 dynes per centimeter.  And going the max of 95.60% represents a drop of only 0.93 dynes per centimeter.

 

Now, I hope EVERYONE on the Planet understands the selection and significance of 22.000%

 

This data is available from many reference sources such as "The Handbook of Chemistry and Physics", "Lange’s Chemical Handbook", etc.  However, I choose the most comprehensive study of alcohols and water starting at 20 degrees C to 50 degrees C, at 5 degree. C intervals, and the Surface  Tension done at 20 C.  The slopes of the 25 C graph are identical only the values are different.  They presented their representations in two decimal places, and, that is why I conformed to their numbers.  Other resources clearly  establish 22.000% , that is why in is in the formulation.

I do not take any credit for any of the values stated.  The credit need to be given to Dr. Gonzalo Vazquez, Dr. Estrella Alvarez and Jose M. Navaza that was recorded in "The Journal of Chemical Engineering".  All products were supplied by Merck Laboratories and all solutions were prepared to 4 decimal places on identical Sartorius Analytical Balances, but the results were chosen to be represented to only 2 decimal places.

 

 

Now @mijostyn we have established your reasoning for your selection of BAK.  Thank you for making that clear, and, in your case, it is TRULY a VERY SIGNIFICANT matter, and one that can not be ignored.  You asked if the BAK is detrimental in any way.  The only detrimental effect is the resultant residue, but more significantly, your level of 7.600% parts by weight is "off the charts" so to speak, which now leads to a more significant level of residue resultant.

 

But most importantly you need something that will not only will kill the mildew and mold, but also something that will prevent it from further happening.

 

I have the PERFECT solution for you, and, it is something with which you are very familiar.  The additive is:  2-phenoxyethanol.   It is a hand antiseptic for surgeries, and is in some hand antiseptics, and, is used as a preservative in IV medications and vaccines.

 

A 1.00% addition is over kill.  A 0.500% represents a 87.5% potency of a 1.00% addition.  (It is non-linear).  Therefore if you were to use 0.500% of 2-phenoxyethanol, it would be much less than the 7.600% BAK you were using.  But you would have NO residue, and the effectiveness is even difficult to compare because the 2-phenoxyethanol is so much more effective.

 

"I wold like to continue but my "medical demon" is summoning me."  The rest  will have to wait until Wednesday.

In the interim, find out how easy it is for you to obtain the 2-phenoxyethanol.  It is commonly used in labs as well, my wife has some here at home, but. Its’ best before date has long passed.  It is still good and effective but not to the same degree.  Good Luck!  Till later…

@rich121 

What is RO/DI water?

And, a problem exists?  I was not talking down to @lewm  

How did you ever get that impression?  I was agreeing with him and encouraging him to be confident in his suppliers.  And, that confidence is important.  (I sometimes question myself as to why I respond to such posts.)

I do not NEED to PROVE that distilled water is better than deionized.  And I do not NEED to PROVE that double distilled water is better than distilled water.  I have not voiced ANY OPINIONS.  I only present facts and well established data.

I posted this forum to present "The Very Best Record Cleaning Formulation", and any other technicnical areas if requested.  Ant to answer questions about my formulation, and not what other people say to each other.  Please discuss that amoung yourselves, and, perhaps discuss it at a better and more appropriate location.

Good Evening!

 Figure 39 – Water + Alcohol Surface Tensions of at 25°C from PACVR
(adapted with permission copyright 1995, American Chemical Society)

 Data for Figure 39 is from “Surface Tension of Alcohol + Water from 20 to 50°C”, Gonzalo Vazquez, Estrella Alvarez, Jose M. Navaza, Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data. 1 May 1995.    

@wizzzard
RO/DI water is Reverse Osmosis/De-iodized water... which is what I use. I use a 7-Stage system that gives me a zero ppm reading on my TDS meter..
RO/DI is the process used to get water in the purest form, Ultrapure, ASTM Type 1 regeant grade, which impurities are measured in parts per trillion.