Thiel Owners

Oblgny, the 2.4's will be smoother, more refined in the upper midrange/treble, the 3.5's are more coherent throughout, have deeper bass and is much easier to drive.
http://www.stereophile.com/content/thiel-cs24-loudspeaker-measurements#koJxkckLClGEdits.97
Many, if not most would choose the 2.4's, I much prefer the sealed box 3.5's.

Thanks! for sharing- unsound.

I was waiting to hear what unsound would say...  

For me, going from the CS2 to the CS2.4 was a no-brainer. There was enough bass extension and tightness to make the jump. 

The 3.5 (or 3.6) is tricker because of their aforementioned attributes.  I'm not convinced I'd hear the difference at the top end, so it'd come down to the aesthetics of the slimmer design, smaller footprint, and refined craftsmanship.  

Oh, and having the cable connections at the back, instead of the bottom!

^I prefer the bottom mounted cable terminals:-).

Thanks! for sharing- saffron_boots

yes, going from the CS2 to a CS 2.4 is quite a jump in quality from the top octave to bottom octave.  Happy Listening!