Thin Line Between Critique and Courtrooms: A Dialogue on the Recent Audiophile Drama

I will return back your question to yourself ? why do you need sarcasm instead of argument in an audio platform especially against someone as rational as atmasphere ?

For my mental health personal report , it is not for you here to have an answer...

This thread is about a precise matter which you can adress as i did myself and atmasphere with "arguments" and reason ...Not with insult, innuendos, sarcasms only and mainly ...

Anybody using arguments and reason here is welcome... Even me... 😁

By the way i never "impose" my opinion as you just did with your personal adress to atmasphere, me i always gave plenty of arguments and  anybody can reply with arguments  ... Nobody can give an argument as answer to sarcasm, as your useless pointing to atmasphere "ego" was...

is it clearer ?

I am not a perfect human being too  because i answered you ... 😊

@mahgister

I repeat, " Why do you waste your supremacy on such a trivial platform as this?"

Also, why do you have to impose your opinion on any subject?

@mahgister 

Another non-answer.  

I repeat, " Why do you waste your supremacy on such a trivial platform as this?"

Also, why do you have to impose your opinion on any subject?

I just replied...

but in your urge to insult people you seems you need the last word...

This was my answer :

"I am not a perfect human being too  because i answered you ... 😊"

now we go back to the matter of the thread...

Enjoy the evening ...

So many enjoying the destruction of someone's livelihood. The non creators destroying those that create. All over a youtuber? Look not a fan of the speaker designs but you all are just cruel.

Unfortunately I didn’t get to read the review in question before it went down, but from what I gather the review itself wasn’t all that negative and the measurements were the main source of the problem. Is that about right?

I only received two products for review over 17 years that didn’t sound at least mostly good, and as I’ve mentioned before if a product has risen to the level of getting a review it’s pretty much already been vetted as being a very promising performer, which is mostly why you don’t read many outright negative reviews. One of the subpar products did some good things but were over overshadowed by a significant limitation elsewhere, so I simply pointed out the good and less good without outright trashing the product, but the point was made (and thankfully I wasn’t sued). In the other case it was an otherwise well-reviewed speaker from a well-known manufacturer that was likewise significantly flawed IMO, and I even had an audiophile buddy come over and he felt the exact same way. I contacted the company thinking maybe they were out of spec or damaged, and the company responded that they’d redesigned the driver and had me send the review pair back. I never received the redesigned speaker back for review and still don’t know if the review pair was defective or what, but I’m glad I never had to write that review. Point is, there are ways to handle these things with some simple and respectful communication both ways without either possibly wrongly trashing a product or threatening a reviewer with legal action. This situation with Tekton seems to have been mishandled on multiple levels, and as someone mentioned earlier this kind of thing is rare I think because most people in the industry are thankfully respectful and reasonable despite perhaps a few bad apples. That’s been my experience anyway and FWIW.