@cd318 My evolving experiences with trialing methods to mechanically isolate my system and especially the Source of the system has always been in a environment where Concrete Floors and Brick Walls has be present.
I have never been exposed to very busy Transport that is in close proximity.
The methods I use today are different to the ones I used in the past at different homes. Is the earlier methods inferior to today's used methods?, or is the different homes/environments requiring a different approach to the methodology used for a support structure and the materials used?
I have stated in the past, experiences have shown to me there is not a ubiquitous solution for all environments, and then there impact on the sound from using materials, the produced sonic is one that can be altered/tuned, and when confident with toying with structures, the sonic can be produced to be close to the preference of the end user. This extended practice will equate to differences for selections of materials and how they are configured within a structure.
I agree that the ambient environment being quiet, as a result of not being a hive of activities is a valuable asset. Also the quietness of the room dedicated to the audio experience is critical, this is where Room Acoustics comes into play and working with the space to minimise the impact of the sound produced on the sound being produced. All of the interfaces that are present whilst using Audio Equipment have a importance, probably all are equal.
Well thought out Electrical Interfaces can be extremely valuable at producing a detailing that is detectable/perceivable within the produced sound.
Good choices for materials and the positioning within the Room, will manage unwanted sound, which can generate new sound or colour produced sound.
The choice adopted for mechanical interfaces are broad, and some of the requirements that are working are shared within this Thread.
The best is to be had, if all three of the above are given considerations.