Phono stage / cart type and output compatible is not a question, what more interesting is mechanical, physical site of matching.
- ...
- 22 posts total
In theory everything explained here Practically it’s subjective, we have different systems and you have no idea who is a person who will answer your question (and his/her experience with different tonearms/cartridges). |
Practically it’s subjective, we have different systems and you have no idea who is a person who will answer your question (and his/her experience with different tonearms/cartridges). Of course it’s subjective, I don’t try to reach some dogma or universal solution. The question is theoretical, no intention to solve an issue or make a decision here. Other people experience in this matter that exactly what interesting. |
our experiences say. even though it's compliance match. that's only one part of whole puzzle. Mc is a different animal. due to low gain. noise. vibration. isolation. inherant resonant.. much more expensive and effort to get it optimized. it will just sound fake detail, digital.or even anemic. otherwise. Alot of people think and say this unoptmised Version is an improvement of MM, better speed. Bass. slap. but annoying.. but why bother play with turntable if it's sounds worse than cd.? might as well get an R2R dac and get it over with. But a well executed Mc is wonderful. just very rare in our case. my bud just called in morning and rant .. why he used triplaner and Lyra titani it sounded like crap. blah blah.. the best one he tried is pushma and delos. and so on. still discussing about how way easier to get MM system sounds great with just a vintage Sony direct drive. this fella had tried Alot of things in Mc.. alot.. of high end tt and cart has pass through his hand.. so we are not simply parroting. he paid real school fees |
- 22 posts total