2. digital
  3. 118967-15158

Universal Players vs. Dedicated CD/SACD Players

Greetings all. I'm curious what other's experiences are listening to Universal Players vs. "dedicated" cd/sacd players. I have an Oppo BDP95 based on the reviews and convenience of the "one-box" solution. However, I've been wondering if I'm missing some audio performance this way. I'm more into sound than video BTW. I have an audiophile friend who says he doesn't like audio and video in the same box. I've entertained thoughts of purchasing a dedicated audio cd/sacd player. Your input is appreciated.

128x128beernut
jafant's avatar
jafant
19,708 posts
 
As a purist, I too, prefer my Audio separate from my Video spinners.
Keep me posted & Happy Listening!
dave_b's avatar
dave_b
3,159 posts
 
The Modwright Sony XA5400ES OR Oppo 105 are world class.  I prefer the Modwright XA5400ES...as close to vinyl as it gets without the clicks and pops!
jafant's avatar
jafant
19,708 posts
 
Thanks! for sharing- dave_b.
lynott
87 posts
 
Personally, I prefer keeping things separated. I have a dedicated CD/SACD player in my main rig and an Oppo 103 universal in my second system (for the rare DVD-A and Blu-Ray Audio disc I own). I put the Oppo in the main stack for giggles, but as decent as it is, it couldn't hold a candle to my Marantz player on either redbook or SACD. Then again, the Marantz cost many times the money of the Oppo, so it didn't come as a terrible shock to me.
initforthemusic
282 posts
 
No contest. A quality dedicated CD player will annihilate the Oppo/Cambridge universal players on redbook playback.
More to discover