thanks both. i think you're both kind of right in that sometimes it is best to try one approach T setup vs equilateral. oh, and toe in definitely changes things depending on a lot on which speaker it is.
so, like i said i started to agonize over whether the instructions meant the T distance, point mid-way between speakers, vs the equilateral.
now, a little more info, my ear height is 42-43". which seems high! and i know again from the manual that non titled speakers are time aligned to 33". i'm a taller person so my only other choice is to get a lower seat which is most likely not going to happen.
"T" distance for me is that 7.8ft and equi distance is 8. well, 7.8ft isn't even on the chart for tilt, it'd be like just over 4" of tilt. whereas 9ft is 3ish or 3.5" of tilt.
and, yes, i'm probably being way to rigid when it comes to this tilt thing, i was trying to find a new starting point.
musically speaking - norah jones nightingale song, sounded so different when i sat on the floor in front of my couch, 2-2.5ft closer (T distance) and ear's 32" off the floor. how did it sound different? it seemed like there was more airy sound with the opening guitar and first few words of voal. mix in with that some "grain" or "texture" or maybe "openess" to the sound. - like a french silk pie made with granular sugar.
whereas up back in my couch with correct time alignment, things seemed smoother and laid back and not as defined, like a french silk pie made with powdered sugar.
so i started questioning - i thought if the tweeter sound got to your ears first it would sound like the "grain" and here i was sitting on the floor, with the midrange sound getting to me first (cuz i didn't change the tilt). to me, standing up always made speakers sound more grain/airy or just plain bright.
does that make sense? oh, and even though i was a lot closer to the speakers than they were wide apart, the image was still smack dab in the middle, like a razor :)
thanks.