Vinyl / High qual analog tape / High-res digital -- One of these is not like the other

One common theme I read on forums here and elsewhere is the view by many that there is a pecking order in quality:

Top - High Quality Analog TapeNext - VinylBottom - Digital

I will go out on a limb and say that most, probably approaching almost all those making the claim have never heard a really good analog tape machine and high resolution digital side by side, and have certainly never heard what comes out the other end when it goes to vinyl, i.e. heard the tape/file that went to the cutter, then compared that to the resultant record?

High quality analog tape and high quality digital sound very similar. Add a bit of hiss (noise) to digital, and it would be very difficult to tell which is which. It is not digital, especially high resolution digital that is the outlier, it is vinyl. It is different from the other two.  Perhaps if more people actually experienced this, they would have a different approach to analog/vinyl?

This post has nothing to do with personal taste. If you prefer vinyl, then stick with it and enjoy it. There are reasons why the analog processing that occurs in the vinyl "process" can result in a sound that pleases someone. However, knowledge is good, and if you are set in your ways, you may be preventing the next leap.

"Pretty cute but that’s been my standard comeback for ten years. "

Unfortunately for you, audiogon search would not support your attempt to be original while copying other’s wit.

Well, now when you added that part about small fee and other non-sense, you should be ashamed to have no jokes of your own and steal others’. You do grab a number of my ideas and present them as yours, which would be fine if you did not poach them and then insult me.

Get yourself your own jokes, like others do. It is sad to watch you steal and pretend it was yours. Shame on you. I know you are envious, but have some face.

At least I have one funny post. Guess what, all mine. Not stolen from someone else.