I think I have corrected a couple of mistakes. Still ignores room loading, absorption, and full spectrum of frequencies.
86db/1m/2.83V = 86bd/1m/2w. Not 83db/1m/2w.
If you listen at a level that produces 96db peaks it would go something like this
2w/1m = 86db with one speaker
Second speaker adds 3db for 2w/1m = 89db
Subtract 3db for each doubling of distance away from speakers. 3m = 5db, or 2w/3m = 84db
Double the power requirements for each additional 3db;
4w/3m = 87db,
8w/3m = 90db,
16w/3m = 93db,
32w/3m = 96db.
32w. Not a lot of power for what, to me, is a fairly loud 96db peak.
I sat down yesterday and checked the SPLs at the levels I listen. Loud to me is measured peaks at 85db on a RS meter. There may be unmeasured spikes in there from transients, but certainly no higher than 90db.
The reason this intrigues me is; I recently went to an active biamp setup from a passive biamp on 1.6s with rather startling improvements. Much greater clarity and coherence all around, and at higher volumes. Having started on the more power helps bandwagon, I have being looking to pull the trigger on more powerful amps than the current 170w Arcams that I own (probably better quality too).
I want to be smart about it, but the analysis on paper doesnt match my limited experience. No substitute for auditioning to learn is there?
Jim S.