What Power Amplifier Should I Buy?

@jaytor Yeah, I have always had concerns about the EQ. But some form of EQ is needed to help tame some of the FR variations from the room.

I have traps which are very effective. I don't need more, except for the floor to ceiling mode. But the "rules" prevent me from doing that. I have worked very hard at positioning the speakers and the sub to get the best FR, but there are still +/- 6 dB variations in the bass. I am restricted to near the present locations. I have tried a miniDSP Flex. It doesn't affect the time domain at all and is barely better than the analog EQ. I ditched that. And I enjoy the idea that I have an all analog signal path (except for the CD/DVD and music files).

So the dBx EQ is a somewhat "necessary" evil. I could live without it, but the engineer in me strives to have as perfect FR and TR (Temporal Response) as I can manage to obtain.

The XO does a very good job, far better than the Rane I once used. I don't like the idea of running the f208s full range and band limiting the woofer. However I haven't tried this in a while. Might be worth a shot.

Are you aware of any reviews on the Sublime XO?

Very helpful advice. Thanks.

@kevemaher - I suspect the crossover is not the biggest issue. I actually own a Sublime K235 (their newer model) and it seems pretty good although I don't currently have in my system. The graphic equalizer has many more lower-quality op-amps and capacitors in the signal path, so I think this is probably the bigger issue. 

If you really need equalization, I'd suggest looking for a decent DSP preamp, such as the Anthem STR or DEQX Pre-4.

Another option is the Danville Signal DSP Nexus. This isn't quite as fancy from a case-work perspective, and the software is quite complex (but there is good support), but the sound quality is pretty good using the latest AKM DACs. I also have a DSP Nexus 2/8 that I've been playing around with. 

And then there are the Trinnov systems although I don't know if their products support a phono preamp or even analog input.

After all this discussion of power, I bought a Bryston BP-17 cubed preamp. I'll get it next week. This discussion has convinced me that I have enough power from my power amp. So I decided to see if the much newer BP-17-3 can outperform the aged Levinson #38s. I hope so.

I'm not sure if anyone is still paying attention, but...

My time with the BP-17 has come to an end. I could not get rid of the sibilance that drives me crazy. The ergonomics are OK, but nothing like the Levinson 38s. I've listed it, but not on Audiogon yet.

Now I use my old, old Paragon System E as a line preamp and a phono preamp. I still use the 38s, but now it is relegated to volume control because it has a remote. The Paragon does not.

This is the best sound I have gotten so far. I have rebuilt the Paragon PSU, replacing all components except the transformer, so it should be good for a while.

The Paragon is a tube preamp with six 12AX7 tubes. I've got new tubes (JJ). It was sold in the late 70s through the mid 80s. I bought mine new.

I'm finished with this quest. Although I have not found the Grail, I am quite pleased with the relics that I have. I've firmly decided I don't need an amp with more power output.

Gotta go buy some records. My gear search has ended.

@kevemaher

Your Bryston 2.5B cubed specs show:

Power Output (per channel): 135W @ 8Ω | 180W @ 4Ω

However, Stereophile F208 review here suggests you need more current:

…. F208 will need to be driven by a good 4 ohm-rated amplifier…..

and that there was plenty of bass. Therefore a more powerful amp with adequate current is likely better than adding subs

Generally, a speaker rated at 8 ohms only hints at being average to easy to drive, while a 4 ohm is harder. But a further look into the frequency vs impedance/phase test/chart of the F208 reveals it needs more power