When to change a cartridge?


I currently own an EMT HD006 cartridge that cost about $1900. That's as much as I've ever paid for a cartridge. Previously I was in thousand-dollar territory. I can't imagine spending $5K for something that's assured to wear out. I play my turntable (VPI Prime Signature 21) every day for at least a few hourse. I guage that I put about a thousand hours a year on my cartridge, which is now at about 1500 hours.

I have read forums in which people talk about putting their cartridge under a microscope every few months. I don't own a microscope and I wouldn't know what to look for if I did. After reading forums in which people talk about cartridges wearing out before the manufacturer's recommended hours, I began to hear my cartridge slowly declining. I thought perhaps the attacks weren't as crisp.

I called my online dealer to discuss replacing mine, telling him that I thought I heard deterioration in the cartridge's sound. He said it doesn't work that way. I will know when my cartridge is ready to be changed. It will not be subtle. Often the suspension collapses. 

My reaction was that a dealer wouldn't talk me out of spending about $2K unless that expense was foolish. So, I am still playing my EMT HD006 and not worrying about subtle changes as it wears down. The dealer said it might be fine for up to 3,000 hours.

I'm curious to know what other people do about their cartridges. Wait for the suspension to collapse and the thing sounds terrible, or monitor it more closely and perhaps even change the cartridge before the manufacturer's recommendation?

audio-b-dog

Bill, you are a serious musician.

I wanted to ask you about Lamm amps. Did you compare them with other top tube amps ? VAC, CAT, some Japanese perhaps ? In any case, there must be something very special about Lamm. But you don't use Lamm preamp or phono stage. Not as good as power amps?

whart, I wish I could warm to digital. Perhaps I have not spent enough $ on it. I recently bought the least expensive Moon (280D) streamer with DAC. I compared it against a $9K Linn and hardly heard any difference.

When I put on a record (varying by recordings, of course) it is so much more present than even the best digital. I think the best digital recording I have heard is Patricia Barber's "Clique." It's at least 192 sampling and sounds damn good, but it just doesn't come from an envelope of air the way vinyl does, at least in my system. Again, though, I have put much more money into my analogue front end. 

One thing I do like about digital is that it is smoother, but music, as I'm sure you know, is not always smooth. You said you played the French horn. Saturday I heard Dudamel conduct Mahler's Fifth. Man, that French horn jumped out at me. From my experience, I can only come close to that kind of sound on vinyl.

It is not entirely level of investment... although an appropriate level of investment vs ones analog end is important, and so is the brand choice. I owned Sim for many years... and that is not the equipment you want to be putting up against analog. It is just too digital sounding. 

 

I also have a lot of experience with Linn streamers and DACs. There are multiple levels of DAC and need to be paired with appropriate preamp / amp. 

But careful choices and investment digital streaming can sound as good or better than analog. 

ghdprentice, what brand of streamers and DACs would you recommend to compare to analogue? I owned a Moon CD player that was fairly expensive and I did not like it at all. It exaggerated the midrange, sounding pretty good at first. It took me a little while to recognize the distortions.

What is your other equipment?

For streamers, Aurender. For DAC, Audio Research, Berkley.