Why no reviews of the Magnepan 3.7 in Stereophile

Don't need validation I love my purchase I Just wanted people to be aware of the politics involve in reviews from Stereophile ,I think this forum has done that enjoy the music remember that's what it's all about.

Don't need validation I love my purchase I Just wanted people to be aware of the politics involved in reviews from Stereophile ,I think this forum has done that enjoy the music remember that's what it's all about.

"I Just wanted people to be aware of the politics involve in reviews from Stereophile"

There are no "politics" involved in this matter. See JA's statement at http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/critics/messages/5/59144.html

Magnepan wanted a review that was not accompanied by objective measurements. JA measures all speakers submitted for regular reviews and, consequently, Magnepan chose not to respond to his request for the 3.7s.

Lack of low frequency extension and a narrow dispersion pattern , there not going to test well .

TAS has never measured anything which was their major attraction back when Julian Hirsch was writing for Stereo Review and measured everything which was easier to write about than the sound anyway. Of course back then TAS had no advertising and reviewed loaner equipment from owners or manufacturers who could justify the risk since they couldn't really afford to advertise and their equipment would have measured the same as other components costing far less. IMHO TAS has far less credibility than it did in those days. Stereophile has some value but all reviews in all the magazines have to be taken w/ a large grain of salt given their dependence on advertising revenue. Magnepan got the review they wanted from TAS in the format that Magnepan finds most comfortable. I don't really have a problem with that. Ultimately the buyer has to make his/her own decision based on, hopefully, more than an (indirectly) paid review.