In general, when dealing with balanced audio connections, the cable itself should have a minimal impact on sound quality, especially over short distances. Balanced connections are designed to reject interference and noise, making them less susceptible to signal degradation due to cable quality compared to unbalanced connections. However, this doesn't mean that all XLR cables are created equal, and some factors can influence your choice of XLR cables: just like Cable Length、Build Quality、Interference、Personal Preference
XLR cables for a reasonable price?
I've seen lots of threads where it is stated that balanced components are "insensitive" to cables. Does this mean that spending a lot of money on XLR cables is probably unnecessary, as it offers no sonic benefit over cheaper XLR cables?
I would like some recommendations on reasonably priced XLR cables that give excellent sonic performance. Thanks for your replies.
- ...
- 99 posts total
A while back, somehow I came across @atmasphere numerous comments about Mogami wire / XLR. I have all Ayre equipment - QB-9 Twenty DAC, KX-5 Twenty Preamp, VX-5 Twenty amp with Wilson Audio speakers. If Ayre equipment isn't balanced, I don't know what is. |
@inna I think maybe you've bought a ticket for the wrong flight. |
A friend of mine was considering buying Mogami interconnects and to help out I did a lot of research. My conclusion, only from research, was that the Mogami interconnects are worth their price… meaning that if they cost $100 their sound quality is in line with $100 interconnects… versus say $1,000 or higher, major high end brand interconnects.. like Cardas, Transparent, etc. I have not tried them myself, but I found the conclusion very compelling, and consistent with their construction. |
@ghdprentice @tonywinga I can’t stress enough how important it is to support the balanced standards! If the designer does not do this, regardless of whatever benefit they might think is there, the simple fact is that you lose the benefit of cable neutrality. IOW, you’ll hear differences between cables, and that isn’t a good thing! The reason its not a good thing is very simple: next year, whoever made your cable will have a better one, and if he doesn’t, someone else will. Everyone here knows that. Its good that the system is revealing so that it can delineate cable problems, bad that the cables have problems that can be heard as ’bad, good, better’ and so on. If you hear differences between two cables, neither one is right. Put another way, if you are hearing differences between balanced cables, this makes it highly likely that the equipment you are using for that audition doesn’t support the standards, even though fully differential and/or balanced. I’m not saying that equipment doesn’t sound good- I’m sure it does. But because it doesn’t support the standard, there is a veil between you and the music which is the cable itself. I can’t think of a good reason to not support the standard- only bad ones: there are only three ways to do it and they all cost money. One way is to use an output transformer, another way is the way we do it, which we patented. Most high end companies don’t like paying patent fees solely on ego (’not invented here’). There’s an integrated circuit that does the job as well, but many tube preamp producers are loathe to put something like that at the output of their preamp. So we have a large number of manufacturers that for whatever reason aren’t supporting the standard; I very much doubt its for sound quality reasons! |
- 99 posts total