2. speakers
  3. 1313267854

Zu Druid MK IVs vs. Essences

I'm trying to decide between these two speakers and, after reading lots of reviews and impressions on-line, I'm more confused than ever. I'd like to hear what differences Audiogoners have experienced between the two. Of course, I'm not looking for the final word, or consensus - just folks' subjective impressions.

I won't get to audition either speakers, because I'm in northwest Wisconsin and a bit isolated. But I've bought a fair number of speakers without hearing them, so that doesn't worry me. I like revealing speakers that are a bit upfront and I'd rather have scintillating highs and great mids than thundering bass. I even like a little thin-ness in the bass.

Thanks in advance for any impressions you can offer.
128x128klein_rogge
naggots
115 posts
 
The main point everyone misses when constantly dredging up the stereophile measurements ..... Is it's a Druid mk2, with different Audax tweeter and frd...... Nothing like a mk4/08..... As well as the bass requires the cabinet loading from being 10mm off the floor.

The things the Druid do well they do really well...... Lunar eclipse awards from 6moons suggests its better than average.....
bjesien
1,277 posts
 
I'm thinking of buying a pair of Soul originals for my kids room. Found a high quality tube integrated at the dump swap shop.

Only thing that concerns me is the lack of grills. I assume the drivers are really rugged and these are sold to folks with children. No problems yet with the Verity Parisfals or Vandersteen 5's but they have coverage.

I'd appreciate any opinions.
docks
43 posts
 
These aren't "Stereophile Measurements"
1. Its soundstage magazine.
2. All loudspeaker measurements are performed independently at the National Research Council of Canada.
3. That's why PSB, Paradigm and a few other Canadian makes are very accurate for a good price.

I suggest everyone seriously look at these graphs.
http://www.soundstagenetwork.com/measurements/zucable_druid/
sebrof's avatar
sebrof
835 posts
 
Docks - I've seen the graphs before. They look terrible.
The reason why the NRCC suspends the speakers under test is so they can minimize room/boundry interactions. That's all good, unless your speaker happens to use the floor to produce sound. If that's the case, the test, and your graphs, are pretty useless.
That's my understanding anyway. And you don't seem to be addressing that directly so I guess you're unaware??
tls49's avatar
tls49
1,351 posts
 

Klein,
Here's a review for the Omen Def that you might find interesting. The reviewer kept the speakers, and also said another pair he wanted to keep after reviewing was the Reference 3A Grand Veena.

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue54/zu_defs.htm
More to discover