What Matters and What is Nonsense


I’ve been an audiophile for approximately 50 years. In my college days, I used to hang around the factory of a very well regarded speaker manufacturer where I learned a lot from the owners. When I started with audio it was a technical hobby. You were expected to know something about electronics and acoustics. Listening was important, but understanding why something sounded good or not so good was just as important. No one in 1968 would have known what you were talking about if you said you had tweaked your system and it sounded so much better. But if you talked about constant power output with frequency, or pleasing second-order harmonic distortion versus jarring odd-order harmonics in amplification, you were part of the tribe.

Starting in the 1980s, a lot of pseudo scientific nonsense started appearing. Power cords were important. One meter interconnects made a big difference. Using a green magic marker on the edge of a CD was amazing. Putting isolation dampers under a CD transport lifted the veil on the music. Ugh. This stuff still make my eyes roll, even after all these years.

So I have decided to impart years and years of hard won knowledge to today’s hobbists who might be interested in reality. This is my list of the steps in the audio reproduction chain, and the relative importance of each step. My ranking of relative importance includes a big dose of cost/benefit ratio. At this point in the evolution of audio, I am assuming digital recording and reproduction.

Item / Importance to the sound on a scale of 1-10 / Cost benefit ratio

  • The room the recording was made in / 8 / Nothing you can do about it
  • The microphones and setup used in the recording / 8 / nothing you can do about it.
  • The equalization and mixing of the recording / 10 / Nothing you can do about it
  • The technology used for the recording (analog, digital, sample rate, etc.) / 5 / nothing you can do about it.
  • The format of the consumer recording (vinyl, CD, DSD, etc.) 44.1 - 16 really is good enough / 3 / moderate CB ratio
  • The playback device i.e. cartridge or DAC / 5 / can be a horribe CB ratio - do this almost last
  • The electronics - preamp and amp / 4 / the amount of money wasted on $5,000 preamps and amps is amazing.
  • Low leve interconnects / 2 / save your money, folks
  • Speaker cables / 3 / another place to save your money
  • Speakers / 10 / very very high cost to benefit ratio. Spend your money here.
  • Listening room / 9 / an excellent place to put your money. DSPs have revolutionized audio reproduction
In summary, buy the best speakers you can afford, and invest in something like Dirac Live or learn how to use REW and buy a MiniDSP HD to implement the filters. Almost everything else is a gross waste of money.
128x128phomchick
Well I'm in deep do-do, cuz my amp & preamp cost 10K and my Infinity Ren 90's $1500.  Drat the luck.-John

@jdave. When vinyl junkies agree that DACs sound as good as vinyl, then DAC technology has matured. 

Every Audiophile has their own thing! I look at the system as a whole, including our personality. Trying to call something nonsense is....nonsense. What is nonsense to one hobbyist will be the listening savoir to the next. One thing I find fascinating is looking at my facebook friends and their diversity. The facebook audio clubs they belong to tell the story of how big of a hobby this is and it's many chapters. What I find remarkable is the number of people who have mixed the old with the new or even the number of people who have gone back to the old after spending a few years in the new, to only find the new lacking in some musical way.

As far as tweaks go, HEA is tweaks. Plug & play is a tweak and the extreme tuning of a system is a tweak. Putting your faith in a component is a tweak. Moving speakers around the room is a tweak. Electronic acoustic adjusters are tweaks as well as acoustical treatments. Your listening or living room is a tweak. There is no dividing line between what is or isn't tweaky, only a dividing line in personalities, perceived knowledge and progress in our own minds and egos to explore. There is no nonsense in audio, anything goes for the individual who chooses to go.

Michael Green

www.michaelgreenaudio.net

Michael Green,

"What is nonsense to one hobbyist will be the listening savoir to the next."
Who could disagree with this one? It is important to remember it from time to time. Of course, vice versa also applies. What is the listening savior to one hobbyist will be non-sense to the next. I will leave it to the arguers on-call to mention some examples here.

"Putting your faith in a component is a tweak."
Huh, you could have left this one out. It becomes way too broad of a description to even consider it debatable or, to those who do not find it as their savoir, acceptable. Maybe added one of the major tweaks of the sound to the list instead, listening volume?

"...tell the story of how big of a hobby this is..."
It is an interesting observation in complete opposition from mine. I am sure we all have different friends. I am talking only about real living people we know and may meet, not virtual Facebook and Internet personae. I know only one (repeat, one) person who has had any inclination to buy anything more than a Bluetooth speaker or some Bose Wave Radio variant. Everybody else seems to be content with the sound coming from their iPhone speakers. I am sure that audio hobby is not missing diversity, but I think that it is far from being a big one. Unless that "big" referred to those few interested in it thinking very passionately about it. However, those are probably questions for some other thread with similar chewed-to-exhaustion topic.
Agreed, glupson. I don’t see what is gained by broadening the term "tweak" to encompass everything, because doing that makes the word "tweak" meaningless. My son just "tweaked" by turning his iphone music on. But I can tell you: he ain’t no audiophile.

As I said earlier, the value of what any audiophile is doing with his system will be subjective. What may be a waste of time for you may not be for me. That’s obvious stuff. But value and objectivity also shouldn’t be mixed up either, otherwise we can’t know what we can achieve in reality. It’s one thing to value what you are doing; another to ask what is happening in reality.

On tweaking, I had a lot of fun constructing an isolation base for my new turntable. It was valuable learning from others, and from my own efforts along the way. So I certainly don’t consider my turntable base nonsense or a waste of time. Though, if asked what it has actually achieved in terms of it’s effects, I can say it has measurably isolated the turntable from external vibration like footsteps very well. But I couldn’t lay claim to it’s sonic effects beyond that, if there have been any at all. But, hey, that’s ok, I’m not making any claims, and I had a good time!