What do people place on their platter for dust protection


Just wanted to hit everyone up for some responses. I'm tired of worrying about taking my pristine VM cleaned vinyl on a platter thats been idle for a week. I have a TT in which a dustcover woukd be inpractable. I hadnt googled for it yet. I just wanted to ask here. Plus I'm recovering from surgery and have some extra time.
128x128blueranger
"It was concluded that ozone is not a lung carcinogen in strain A/J mice at those exposure levels. Moreover, this mouse strain appears to be particularly resistant towards chronic ozone toxicity."

It has nothing to do with covering the turntable mat, but as Harry Pearson was quoted and he has no means of explaining what he meant, it may be fair to emphasize a few things. The study may be correct only for those mice and for those exposure levels. It also mentions that the strain of mice may be particularly resistant towards unwanted ozone action. Both of those statements leave the possibility open that Harry Pearson was correct when talking about humans and/or longer exposure.


Interestingly enough, quick search on PubMed does not yield any recent work on ozone and cancer. All we seem to have is one study done twenty years ago in mice that appeared to be particularly resistant to begin with.


I suggest that "carcinogenic tendency of ozone" debate in the thread about covering the turntable mat ends with no clear winner.

Rats and People have not (rpt not) been dropping dead because of ozone exposure or using negative ion air purifiers or using negative ion space gun blasters like the ones I sell. People like you and Harry are easily alarmed.
 😦 
I found my old graphite mat to use. I placed it  on top of my Herbies way excellent mat and the detail was turned up too much to being harsh. I remember as before. I have a made loaded TT with an aluminum platter and softer mats work best
"Just a good memory -article from the 1990’s (HP specifically mentioned the "O2" emissions linked to cancer.)."


dweller,

Do you remember if that was really about O2 or maybe about ozone (O3)? Maybe, that is the misunderstanding part. geoffkait’s response was regarding ozone, not O2.