Big source improvement using CD player

If only there was a way of showing what the correctable and uncorrectable error rate coming off a CD rip or similar was available

If you were an audiophile which your clearly not, you would probably know Arnie Nudell (rip) and Paul McGowan did such a thing (you find out what) and showed it to you in a numerical error counter on the display.
Frightening seeing the differences between good and bad transports, that the error correction didn’t get right.
The lowest count I saw was the Wadia T2000 transport using it’s AT&T High Speed"Glass Fiber" optical output connections using expensive indexing fluid on both ends.
https://ibb.co/PYGZd7t

https://ibb.co/yNmgR1W

There is a good video on youtube about the ability to pick the higher res source (mp3 and wave file were used). Pretty interesting.....A young lady was used as the listener and I would assume being young,  she had excellent hearing....in a few instances, she was unable to tell the difference and chose the lower res files...I think she scored 4 out of 6...I’m still looking for the link. Disclaimer: I’m fully content with the sound of my CD’s and associated equipment and have no desire to ever stream anything Hi-res. I do own many MA Recordings which in themselves are quite spectacular.

Found the link....
https://youtu.be/YgEjI5PZa78

So let me get this right. You think that an optical output using AT&T high speed glass fiber somehow has an impact on the error rate reading off the mechanism. Well then, there is probably not much use of further discussion. Posting pictures of the Wadia does not make your statement any more correct.

You can’t measure error rate at the output of a CD player, or even a transport for that matter, you have to have access to raw data in the transport (or player) in order to determine error rate. I think there have been some players that showed it over the years, but not a popular features.

"Not an audiophile". Is this your poor attempt at "no true Scottsman" or simply an ad-hom? If you let me know, I can better address your attempted but poorly executed insult. Some of us actually care enough about acoustics and audio to have made both an academic and working career out of it.

p.s. I can’t remember anything from Arnie and Paul w.r.t. error rate testing at the output of a transport (since you can’t really do it, it is already corrected at that point), but I do remember a somewhat questionable "report" on jitter. Arnie really was into this concept of black CDs for a while too.

Iaf you were an audiophile which your clearly not, you would probably know Arnie Nudell (rip) and Paul McGowan did such a thing (you find out what) and showed it to you in a numerical error counter on the display.
Frightening seeing the differences between good and bad transports, that the error correction didn’t get right.
The lowest count I saw was the Wadia T2000 transport using it’s AT&T High Speed"Glass Fiber" optical output connections using expensive indexing fluid on both ends.
https://ibb.co/PYGZd7t

https://ibb.co/yNmgR1W

Yes I should have a little more specific, for the one that likes to turn things around to make himself look good. Transport "Clock Error" "Speed Error!! is what it measures, not Tracking Errors.
AT&T ST high speed glass fiber optical with indexing fluid helps reduce jitter, what’s with you!!!

And yes to those here, all three above are transport related errors and to how they sound, and why that slot loaded junk is not up to scratch, compared to a good transport. Cheers George