Can a McIntosh MC7205 handle Polk Audio RTi A9’s?

Those RTI-a-9s’ are amazing speakers, heard a pair at a local shop while ago.
They will need minimum of 300WPC/RMS. TO SOUND their best!

i went another route, I often wonder how they would sound in my home.

Went with the Energy RC-70s’
happy.
but still wonder, I love the subdued treble of these Energys’
Enjoy the RTI-A9s’

et 300 WPC min.  

You can bi-amp also, just have an extra rail left over. 120 for Bass might be a little light. Could also add a passive pre to adjust, the highs via RCA, XLR, IC. It's a Mac, those numbers are VERY conservative... 120 @ 8, for the lows, 120 @ 8 for the highs....Might work great...

Regards

Thanks for all the advice. I read where the 7205 can’t be bridged, but how would I bi-amp them?  I guess I got myself in a pickle. I upgraded from a McIntosh MC58 bridged to 100w/ch that was powering a pair of TSi 500’s and I have to turn up the volume to half the power in HT tv to hear it. On music I notice the TSi 500’s don’t come alive until I turn the volume on the mc58 half way. I’m afraid it’ll be the same or worse with the MC 7205 and the Polk A9’s. 

I checked out bi-amping briefly. Tell me if I’m wrong.  I can biamp channel 1 & 2 and channels 3 & 4 to the RTi A9’s’ and channel 5 to the center RTi a6. I can use my MC-58 bridged to power the TSi 500s surrounds and the remaining 2 channels(30w) ea. To power 2 TSi 100’s or Monitor 40’s. It sounds too easy, where did I go wrong?

If I used my mac58 bridged to send 100w to the HF terminals and my Mac7205 for the LF terms on the RTi A9s and the surrounds. Would that work and would it give me more power for the Polk RTiA9s?