My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


jays_audio_lab
Please don’t get him started. He showed remarkable restraint when equalizer was mentioned 
viber6 - we should have the new Reference 3 speakers here in our sound room in Massapequa  in few weeks - we still feel this is our best location not in our store in Huntington at Sound Insight as we feel having this set up in a real world application as opposed to in a store setting would give the customer a much better idea of how it would actually sound in their home.
As far as Ricevs Comments on the sensitivity of the Maggie’s it would not surprise me at all that they are that inefficient - due to the construction of the maggie membrane and the crossover that is employed this is probably responsible for the inefficiency of the speaker and robbing the amplifier of its rated power.
As previously stated the GT speaker employs a state of the art membrane that does not suffer from the resonance  problems as a typical planar speaker and superior transparency due to no crossover on the main newly designed panel.
All are welcome to audition the new Reference 3.
Will keep all posted when they are set up and ready to audition.


Faxer,
What is the retail price of the new Ref 3 panels....without subs.......and how much are subs?  
So a lot has been said today on here. Hmm... where do i begin?

1. i can not go into too much depth when comparing the 3.7i to the 20.7 anymore than what i have already said on the video. What i can add is that the sound is "different" than conventional woofer/tweeter. It takes time for your ears to adjust to the new sound before you begin to discover the neat things a planar design does that a woofer/tweeter does not. Is the 20.7 better than the 3.7i? yes... i think a deaf person can hear the difference if i am being honest.

2. Merrill Audio 118s vs 116s: i can’t speak about the 116s because i have not owned them. I can speak about the 118s by saying these few things:
  • Much faster sounding than the Dag S250
  • I detect more bass articulation than the Dag S250
  • Smooth, NEVER EVER EVER BRIGHT. I have to try HARD to make this amp sound bright.
3. Merrill combo vs Dag Combo will be an eye opener for some of you. I don’t believe there is any bryston amp that can top a pair of element 118s except for maybe power output.

4. I don’t believe ANYONE has ever used full nordost odin & dragon powercords on a full Merrill set up (if you know of anyone, please share this). I plan to show you all what this set up can do with top end cables.

5. Full Merrill set up with Wilson sounds AMAZING AMAZING. I am not not kidding either. i will try to video this before i am "Wilsonless"

6. I can admit that YES, i like the dynamics, slam and huge sound from wilson audio, but i also liked the Neoliths and Vivid Audio G1s.

7. If i am being honest with you all, i probably prefer Wilson over Magico. This isn’t a knock on Magico, but i feel Wilson is probably more "me".

8. As far as me needing big ass speakers and amps, there is only some truth to that, but not really the case each and every time. However, there is something that some of you don’t understand: Once you own a big speaker with dynamics and huge soundstage, it is HARD AS HELL to go back to a smaller speaker. I tested this when i owned the Neoliths. The speakers that followed my Neoliths sounded like bookshelf speakers in comparison.

9. I am totally enjoying the 20.7s and i totally dig the idea of having a woofer/tweeter speaker and a planar as well because they just don’t sound alike. It is truly amazing to be able to change the flavor of the presentation on the fly so you never ever get bored. That said, i don’t want to buy subwoofers for the magnepans. I don’t have the time or energy to dive into the world of dialing subs and crossovers. I am sure it would be so much better for the 20.7s if i did that, but at some point i need to draw a line with how far i need to take this.

Anyhow, today i could not upload a video because i had a ton of things to do. I will try to have the final video of my Sasha DAW this week. I am going to let you all hear the Daw with Merrill Audio. It is EXTREMELY HARD for me to part ways with the DAW, but i can’t keep 3 pairs of speakers.
WC,
Agree with most of your findings above.  It is true that there are obvious differences between the 3.7i and 20.7.  If you want more bass and less HF, then 20.7 is better.  If you want more HF and can settle with 40 Hz bass, 3.7i is better.  The HF ribbon doesn't bite--it is smooth and extended.  Which one is better, depends on your tonal balance preference, since the drivers are much the same.  To maximize the performance of both the 3.7i and 20.7, toe in properly.

Please do an A/B with Merrill 118 vs Gryphon using any preamp or DCS direct.  Only a guess from your recent remarks--Gryphon is more revealing and less sweet than the Merrill.  Let's see, to settle this question.  It would be interesting, since the Merrill is a flagship GaN class D, and the Gryphon a flagship class A, AB.  Can the Merrill unseat your Gryphon?