Neil Young calls out Tidal

I prefer Seth Rogan to Joe Rogan..... 

@mahgister Eric Clapton is one of the all time great guitarists, but is a known anti-vaxxer. I was just saying Neil is a hippie- I never thought of Clapton as such. He is British….from the 60’s, but not a hippie. I wouldn’t consider the Beatles Hippies either. Think Woodstock…(before my time), .Dylan, Joni Mitchell, Jefferson Airplane, lots of drugs. The key was anti Vietnam war.

The question about the fact that he was or not a hippie make no sense, the essential point is that he is part of this generation like i was and Neil Young and i never really was an hippie myself but recognize my own generation in spite of that...

Second he is not ANTI vaxxer... You read too much propaganda...

An anti vaxxer is someone against all vaxx whatsoever any type and for all disease..

Propaganda assimilate anyone who READ and STUDY and decide to be not "Treated" by this genetic experiment NEVER experimented and studied for his potentioal high risks , which was imposed massively claiming FALSELY urgency because of the absence of treatment is now a PROVEN lie.. All existing treatment were censored... US is next after China in dictatotship... Canada also...

Why do you think the most pacific manifestation and the BIGGEST EVER of this kind in history and for the Guinness book with more than a million and half people at Ottawa and trucks convoy of 350 km long was organized? Awake...The world awake to censorship... Nowhere else censorship and propaganda repeated by the like of Neil Young is more evident than in North America...

Being a celebrity dont increase I.Q. It is the opposite guess why?

And Eric Clapton TAKE this mrna "Vaxx " and suffered greatly the side effects ...He was not and never was an antivaxxer save for Biden and Trudeau lunatics stance...His OPINI ON comes from the falsely claimed and falsely proven secured vaxx and from the heavy health consequenceshe suffered ...

This so called vaxx is not efficient, nor for disease transmission neither for eliminating the disease and less efficient than low cost treatment PROVEN efficient in Uttar Pradesh India for example with a population comparable to the US and no vaxx and NO MORE CASE ... Israel is more vaxx than the US and read the news, catastrophic number of cases....It is even easy to know why if we study scientist free to speak... A nobel price wil do the job if you are doubtful no ?

But for sure no TV journalists in america dont know even where is geographically Uttar Pradesh... American official journalists are all clowns not one reported this important news about Uttar Pradesh save Dr Malone on Joe Rogan boycotted by the mind TV programmed Neil Young..... The only good journalist are almost all free and almost unpaid in parallel media..

Then read before repeating the mantras conditioning formulas on Tv..

It is the same bulshitt in Canada where Trudeau called the truckers anti-vaxx, and a fringe monority of nazis and they were vaxx at 85 % and encouraged by millions of canadian all along their travel......

They are all AGAINST totalitarian Mandate forced on everyone and even woman which are pregant in some case which is a MEDICAL abomination ... Guess why ? without even a medical diploma you will stumble on the answer ...

More stupid than that measure is over my head...

Then think before posting that Antivaxx claims...Please...

I apologize for this rant but the actual world situation is critical ... Freedom cannot be negotiated...Medecine cannot be bought...Even by Bill Gates...

This vaxx make sense ONLY for old people and people with co morbidities... Nothing else but it must be a FREE choice with all the facts... And this is not the case...Ask Pfizer why?

@mahgister Eric Clapton is one of the all time great guitarists, but is a known anti-vaxxer.

CDC and FDA (can’t remember who exactly sets these rules) are set up so that if a prophylactic exists for a given condition..then..experimental ’treatments’ for the contentious conditions, cannot go forward, and the known prophylactic goes forward.

This meant that if ivermectin was found to be effective, no mRNA experimental treatments would ever have been allowed to reach the public of the united states and thus their ability to be used across the entire would would have likely been shuttered and shunned by most of the world’s nation-state governing bodies.

Pfizer, for one, would probably be $200 billion dollars poorer at this time. Never mind all the rest of it that remains unspoken.

For mRNA treatments (they are not vaccines) to be allowed to be used on the citizens of the USA, in their experimental and unapproved form, Ivermectin would have to never be useful to treat covid. No evidence of ivermectin efficacy could ever officially reach the CDC/FDA pairing, at all. Or any other drug/product, either.

Thus, ivermectin was forced to be sidelined. As were others.

There is considerable data and news stories and reporting to illustrate that there was something big going on with regard to blocking all efforts that were outside of the approval of the mRNA treatments for experimental use on people.

Isn’t that just so darned interesting. It makes one think.

FYI ....at the least, there are three ex-heads of CDC/FDA departments, that are now directly on the boards of the major pharmaceutical corporations involved in the proffered experimental mRNA treatments.

There are dozens more interesting points out there about this situation, that do not appear in the mainstream news ~at all~.

~~~~~~~~~

One of those points not found in the news:

IF...a mRNA treatment is finally given approval for use on humans, as an approved treatment, then the public of the united states can sue the given corporation that issued the mRNA treatment. The us public can sue the given pharmaceutical corporation for damages and injuries.

Pfizer mRNA product--- has been approved for use on humans.

But. A really big but.

Pfizer is ..apparently....still not issuing the approved mRNA treatment for humans, in the USA.

They are still issuing the experimental version, which they cannot be sued over the use of.

There exists a pathway for a pharmaceutical company to gain total immunity from being sued over the side effects or health effects of a given mRNA treatment.

That.... is when the given mRNA treatment (or actual vaccine or whatnot)is finally approved for use on ALL citizens of the USA, specially that of children, down to the level of being approved on newborns.

What do we see? We see the lack of issuance of the actual approved product which Pfizer could be sued over..., the quiet and continued distribution/use of the product that Pfizer can’t be sued over... and a tremendous push to gain approval for the use of the mRNA treatment on children and newborns.

The product is being made and used up all the time.

Pfizer could have issued and handed out approved and properly named/labelled vials of their approved product in almost minutes after approval, yet they have not done so.

There is no viable innocent looking reason for this situation of non-approved varieties still being the only ones in use and circulation, anywhere.

teo_audio

CDC and FDA (can’t remember who exactly sets these rules) are set up so that if a prophylactic exists for a given condition..then..experimental ’treatments’ for the contentious conditions, cannot go forward, and the known prophylactic goes forward