CDs And Green Markers. Please Don’t Laugh.


I’m sorry. I apologize. If anything has been done to death, it’s this. And yet . . . 

I was pulling “Darkness On The Edge Of Town” out of my CD player the other day and wondering if Bruce had really made peace with his father when I noticed the edge of the disc was green. Looking through my collection, I found a bunch of them so marked. “Let It Be” by The Replacements. “Murmur.” Stuff that came out during the brief period after the introduction of the CD and before the green pen became an embarrassment. 

I should give a quick kudos to the albums that have survived countless culling that keeps my active collection at about 500 discs. Discs that are easily stored because I always take the discs and printed media out of the ridiculous plastic “jewel” cases and put them in DiscSox, an invention I can’t believe has been overlooked by the Nobel committee. 500 discs fits into five trays from Office Depot and the whole collection takes up about 16x30 inches and the height of a CD. I can’t imagine living with the original packaging. 

I never A/B’ed any of the albums with the green marking. Never looked into the science of the green pen. Back in the day, it was cheap, it was easy, and it was supposed to work. Why not try it? When it became a laughingstock, I stopped. 

But like skinny ties, I assume that green markers have come in and out of vogue many times since 1982. I love a good tweak and wonder if anyone has justified the use of the green marker. I’m not looking far a scientific explanation. Herbie’s Super Black Hole actually works but without anything close to a reason for doing so. I’d be thrilled if the same was true if green pens. 

Besides, those looking for science in audio forums should familiarize themselves with a priori reasoning, and the problems attendant upon it. 

Where have I gone? Why so much wandering? Is it because the initial question is so stupid? Still, I’d like to know: Has anything happened since, say, 1985, that would make greening the edge of CDs sensible?

If not, I promise to apologize and slink quietly back into the darkness.

paul6001

@tweak1 

 

Science doesn't agree and nor do lots of actual people, including the editor of Stereo Review and High Fidelity with his actual measurements. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bewaring-of-the-green/

It is amazing that people here are arguing about something that costs less than 5 dollars and a little bit of time. I haven't done it myself, but why is it bothering anyone if someone else chooses to do it? If the price is too steep, maybe you're on the wrong site. Get a life!

Now I sound like the crank, but I just can’t help myself. Like virtually every thread on this site, this thread has degenerated into a priori or a posteriori thinking. Would-be physicists take a result—or, in this case, more likely an imagined result—and work backward to develop a theory that explains it.


Real science is supposed to work the other way around. That’s why a flotilla of physicists around the world are still busy at work trying to find empirical evidence for Einstein’s theories. 

I use NOVUS.

Long ago there was a $495.00 machine ()AudioDesk CD Sound Improver [Lathe] that would cut the edge of a disc concentric with the center so no vibration and at a 45 degree angle. Then you treat the edge with a black pen. Worked great. . . .... if you got the time.