If one ponders both an analog and/or digital audio chain, seems to be a miracle how close to reality one can get. But audio chains can be (preferences) built to approximate reality/live music, not replace it. Also, the quality of the recordings also play a major sonic part. Comparison to reality often leads to disappointment, seems best to avoid and just enjoy both.
It Happens Every Time I Calibrate
It happens every time … being disappointed with the sound of my system after recalibrating my ears to a live performance. I just returned from a performance of Mendelssohn/Balanchine A Mid Summer Night’s Dream at the NYC Ballet sitting first tier/center at the David H. Koch theater enveloped in the sweet, liquid sound of the orchestra and chorus, and entranced in artistic cue of the choreography. The design intent of my system is founded on reproducing accurate timbre, reproduction of micro and macro dynamics, and organic imaging. Friends that have heard my system comment on the natural, sweet, liquid, dynamic and dense reproduction of recorded music. But it does not come close to a live performance. Much has to do with the recording. Some of the better ones get close. Regardless, even with my best recordings, there are certain artifacts, such as the way strings are reproduced where the sweetness and liquidity is not as pronounced, or the complexity of woodwind or brass instruments is not as prominent that make it clearly evident reproduced sound is far from absolute. My disappointment in my system will last a week or so until my ears loose there calibration, and I will be happy again with my system until the next time I go to the Met, Koch, or Carnegie. Do any of you have similar experiences?
- ...
- 10 posts total
- 10 posts total