Elrod statement vs Shunyata anaconda zitrons


Has anyone compared the Elrod statement to the new shunyat anaconda zitrons? Would appreciate opinions.
jonchew38
Time and technique go on. The MIT AC2 was a good cable when it came out. But time goes one, and these days there are better ones. So what is the best now, can be changed all the time.

You need to improve all the time. MIT did not enough to improve. Other brands improve faster so they have an advantage at this moment.

I said it often; you need to compare as much as you can. Don't stare blindly. Open your eyes and ears.

Before owning it, the part to find the best is the fun part. So use it and enjoy it!!
Bo1972,

You stated:

"The limitation of Shunyata is that they make instruments and voices bigger than they should be."

"Audio is very personal. It is just an opinion."
Know your properties. Every single brand has his own properties. It is important that you are familiar with these properties.

Properties of cables influence the image of an amp/source. When you don't know them you will not understand how your image is build!

That is why comparing is so important. This makes you use properties a lot better.

When you are not aware of properties it will be a big guess. Chance for succes is a lot smaller.
Bo1792,

You have made this same statement elsewhere about Shunyata cables -- authoritatively. Then you say it's all a matter of opinion. Inconsistency seems to rule the day. Your opinions about Shunyata are not shared by all. If they are shared by most I would be surprised. You have yet to reply to this obvious fact in a direct and forthright manner -- except to restate what you have already restated many times.
Often sets who use Shunyata on shows have a stage were instruments and voices are too big.

It Always can be bigger like NBS ( what I sold for 4 years of time)

Listening to live music and comparing audio all the time give you a lot of infomation. You can compare it yourself. Lend a Purist Audio cable and compare it. It is that simple!