Separate Phono Stage-Worth the $$ ?

If you can arrange to audition this you should know right off if it is worth the $. I would think you are doing just fine with what you have unless yours is a very high resolution system.

I have been using the built-in phono section in a Musical Fidelity A300 Integrated, and so far I have auditioned two other phono stages but have not heard any improvement. The job of a phono stage is complex, as you have to match many variables, so unless there is a marked spec difference with the outboard Levison, I would not bother.

Just my $0.02

I think Goyescas' advice is spot-on. In theory, the advantage to a separate phono stage is a dedicated power supply and the ability to place the phono stage away from components (such as transformers) which might affect its operation and induce noise or hum. However, the disadvantage is an additional set of interconnects; there is no interconnect as good as no interconnect at all. If your Levinson is working fine without problems (and I'm sure something from Madrigal would address any noise problems which might affect the phono section), I'd be surprised if there would be a substantial difference between the two units, but it's worth a listen for yuor own ears to decide.

Thanks for the feedback. Being a Linn guy...believing simple is best. I tend to agree about introducing more cables etc. On the other side the system is very revealing. Martin Logans and a Lyra cartridge and it's logical to assume a "separate" phono would be better??
Clavio