About users with hidden agendas

None of my responses have been rude or without warrant. I am not however someone who will be nice to anyone pinching one off on me simply because I’m a manufacturer. The bottom line, my audio viewpoints are aligned with the vast majority of people on this forum. Audio is largely subjective, if people don’t like this fact it’s on them. And if they continue to abuse the majority of participants here on this forum, because we like sharing our experiences which are overwhelmingly subjective, many will push back.

Yours in music,

Ted Denney III

Lead Designer/CEO Synergistic Research Inc.

Thank you @jjss49. I do love this hobby, and I don’t like not being able talk about it, or exchange ideas with my fellow audiophiles. It’s fine if some do not agree with us but the way a few choose to express themselves leaves much to be desired. 

Yours in music,

Ted Denney III

Lead Designer/CEO Synergistic Research Inc.

@jjss49 :

some a-holes here seem to only relish being mean-spirited, talking down and talking sh*t about others like it is sport... guess for them it is a change of pace from kicking the dog and beating the wife

Spot on, you nailed it! It’s those 3-4 names wrecking havoc in all threads. Not just this one.

As for @ted_denney , and the hidden agendas, every post of him I have seen in Audiogon has the signature will full name (real persona) and the title / company. Show me one that doesn’t. So what’s the deal and bi***ing with the “hidden agenda “? And by the way Ted, thanks for keeping politics out of your Audiogon posts. You have not even once gone that route

Okay, let's get back to the fun.

Trannies are tinny!

Tubies are tubby!

Analog ain't awful, it's awesome!

Digital ain't dismal, it's delightful!