Accuphase AC-3 Re-tip new cantilever vs new purchase?


I was looking at a used Accuphase and sending it out for a new stylus and cantilever.

I wonder if this is a good use of 2k or if I should be looking for a new cartridge in the same price range that would provide the same quality.

Does anyone have experience with the Accuphase AC-3? Or an opinion about its quality compared to new products on the market?

Thanks for the advice.

kjim

I have become familiar with materials used to produce the AC 2, but not a Sapphire Tube armature.

I have found Ruby to be the least attractive as an armature when compared to a Cart' of same design with Beryllium as the armature.

Ruby and Sapphire are both Single Crystalline in their structure.

During a Demo's of very similar in design Cart's where different Styli were on the Cart's. The Group of attendees receiving the Demo's, found it hard to make the claim the Styli alone was the cause of the differences detected in the sonic.

It was more easily accepted that the Cart's Parts were most responsible for changes detected in the sonic, and the Armature and Damping Materials were material sensed to be items that has substantial contributing factors.      

Dear @kjim  : I was owner of the AC3 and inside your budget I will go for it. Very good quality performer.

 

Send it to Joseph Long to change only the stylus, this is the way to go with.

 

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,

R.

I have owned an AC1 and AC3. Nice enough cartridges. However I would spend that same money with Mehran at SORASound and get the designers most current cartridges rather than one that is 30 plus years old.