01-19-2020 2:30amIve done this demo (passive vs active) many times.
Active properly executed will outperform passive. The reasons are many: 1) losses through all those copper coils in the passive crossover 2) losses of power, dampening factor, etc though all that speaker cable at speaker level 3) lack of phase control in passives 4) ability to control phase in active 5) passives requiring one big power amp vs active needing the exact right power for each driver element.
The differences will be mainly heard in improvements in imaging, details, bass definition, and dynamics.
Brad
ATC Consumer/Lone Mountain Audio
Thanks so much Brad. Great post and what I have heard also when doing the same thing. I just never had the long time to really do this like you have. I have heard it with a pair of ATC years ago and then with a German brand who's name I forget.
Have you ever done this with anything other than your ATC's? Being that I owned the Vandersteen Treo and now the Quatro's, I think I'm qualified (as a consumer, not a professional) to say similar things. As Richard V told me, that if I were ever able to afford his new amps that were designed with the Quatro and Cento in mind, that I'd have a fully active speaker (although I would still need a speaker cable that gets in the way,lol). He has always loved the idea of controlling everything from start to finish (he won't be making a server though as he's an analog dude).
Even in the KEF LS50's it makes a HUGE difference.
