Anybody else waiting for GaN and Purify to have a baby?


So many promising things being written about products using either technology, anybody know there’s an amp in the near future incorporating both?  Gotta say I’m more than curious about what that could sound like. 
soix
What most people don’t understand is that all products need modding....yes, everything I have ever seen....I can make sound better. When you buy a $70K corvette.....you might not blink an eye spending another $40K to get 1100+ horsepower and 8 second quarter miles. That is because everything in drag racing is known. NOTHING is known....he he...in high end audio. Every single thing you do makes a difference sonic wise and most things cannot be measured......so, everyone is afraid to mod.....they think "only the manufacturer knows enough about this product to improve it."  Actually, the truth is the opposite. There are tons of people out there that can improve the amp or whatever. There is a guy on What’s Best who took his $25K Audio Research Anniversary preamp and did thousands and thousands of $ worth of mods to it. He says it is in another world.....compared to stock.

Why did D’Agostino put big heavy brass binding posts on his $250,000 Relentless amps? Why would he run the signal through a hunk of brass rather than a low mass WBT copper connector? Why would he screw up the sound? Maybe he does not know better. Probably is the truth. So, put some WBT output connectors on a Relentless amp and you have a better sounding amp. Please send me your Relentless amps (575 lbs. each) so I can mod them......NOT!!!!!    By the way, the Audion amps use low mass WBT copper output connectors.....yeah for them.

Most people have never tweaked anything.....most don’t even take off the cover and look inside. The first thing I do when I get a new component is take off the cover and see what I can change to get better sound. I have been doing this since 1980. Most manufacturers have a set goal. A lot of them do not even believe in subjective tweaking. Several of the class D modules (GaN and otherwise) were designed purely for specs or specs plus what they consider "low distortion parts"....mostly gotten by inference. The Voyager and the Peachtree use the same modules and power supply. They will sound similar but not the same. The chassis and its resonance, the footers, the jacks, wiring, etc. all have a sound.
i have a fw f6 here as well as a belles sa30 both outstanding medium wattage class a amps... will get around to trying those as well as the carver against this little mini 5 gan box...  been doing more comparisons among dacs this long weekend, will come back to amps a bit later
pinwa,
  Thanks so much for your comments.  I am very impressed with the soundstage of the F5,and even more so with the J2. To hear that the Peachtree GaN 400 has a deeper soundstage compared to the M2 is very impressive.  I have never heard the M2, but the two FW amps I have posses stellar (IMHO) separation,pinpoint imaging, and soundstage. I think the J2 does this a little better than the F5,but I find the F5 to have a little better detail.  After reading your comparison, would you say the FW has more”meat on the bones” than the GaN 400?  I am really in love with the FW amps,however I always try to have an open mind. 
Post removed 
rixthetrick
Not saying your wrong but myself having once been in the industry as a manufacture i'm looking at it from a manufactures point of view. Nothing more.