@steve59 With all due respect, I work with ATC so I am terribly biased in their favor, but I have worked in the speaker industry for 40 years with many different manufacturers including those with large engineering departments (such as JBL). I have seen a lot and I know the OEM market a bit and how manufacturers make money there. The ATC mid driver is not comparable to anything that I have seen on the market over the past 40 years and even today, it still stands alone. The mechanical design and execution are beyond anything possible in OEM as it would be impossible to turn a profit on it. No one would pay $1400 for one and put it in a speaker. It has features that are not easily explained to a speaker owner as they are a physics and material science master class. A far larger motor, a much greater stability in linearity due to two [dome] suspensions, lower distortion especially under higher dynamic ranges (115dB potential in the SCM150 to reproduce enormous peaks). It is completely hand made to get the results the company owner wanted.
You cannot build that driver on a machine and the techniques to build it are so nuanced that there is no copy available from anyone. I would cost a bloody fortune to reverse engineer and you couldn't sell enough of them to make it worth it. That's why there is no equal out there. I agree there are a few 3 inch mid domes that look like the ATC from the outside. But remove the driver and look at them vs the ATC side by side and there is no comparison between them-from a design and construction point of view. And DSP cannot fix distortion inside the driver- once it's there, it's always there covering up details. .
Brad