Audible Illusions Modulus 3A vs. CJ Premier 14 ?


I'm considering a tube preamp for a solid state amp
(McCormack DNA1). I'd like to hear from those who might
have experience with these two preamps. I listen to a lot of acoustic music.

thanks
dc
corina
I have an Audible right now with a Pass Labs Aleph 3. I got rid of the McCormack DNA 1 because both preamp and amp had too much gain. I wasn't able to turn the preamp up more than three steps on most music. The speakers were 91 db. Too much gain with the audible/mccormack combo if you have half way sensitive speakers.
I.ve had the CJ 14 since l996, like it a lot, not just for the excellent sound quality but for the convenience (a terrific remote) and flexibility (multiple inuts and outputs). Also important with any tube gear is the service you can expect from the manufacturer. CJ is clearly committed to great service. I have no direct experience with AI, but have heard and read numerous not-so-great comments about their service and support.The only downside is that the CJ requires use of an outboard phono stage, while you an get one built into the AI.
The Audible is a great preamp and dare I say a little more neutral than the CJ. Cj preamps have always had a sound that let you know they were CJ's.
The 3A is a great match with McCormack. It offers a dip switch internally that will reduce the gain 7db. I have used one for a lot of years. No complaints. If you talk to Art Ferris, usually he will take care of you.
I did not personally find the gain objectional but I would think this would be system and room dependent.
I am currently using one paired with my Theta Dreadnaught.
Make sure you use the tape inputs or aux. for your CD player. The CD input has a pair of resistors to "Cut CD Glare."
If you want an outboard phono, get an L-1. You can most certainly control its gain. Most feel the L1 sounds at least as good as the 3A.
Tubes make a much bigger difference with AI pre's that most others.