There was a time when amplifier measurements varied greatly, and some claimed specs were less than (let's be generous and say) accurate. Then when specs were actually measured, they started to become way more consistently accurate. Just when the specs started to become little more than academic fodder, some manufactures started a specs war with specs marketing becoming the driving force, even surpassing their reason for being; sound quality. Even though many specs (though not all) taken out of context offer the consumer little insight into how an amp might actually sound, I'd rather not throw the baby out with the bathwater and return to the bad old days. I say keep measuring, keep it in context, and maintain some semblance of quality. Perhaps in the future we'll have better diagnostic tools to help guide us in the vast sea of choices. Even the crude measurements we currently have still offer us a bit of insight into system compatibility.
Best Amp for Timbre, Depth and Spatial Resolution?
I have an Ayre CD player, BADA Alpha DAC, deHavilland Mercury pre-amp, CJ MF-2500A amp and N802 - am looking to upgrade amp.
Would like to hear views on Best Amp for Timbre, Depth and Spatial Resolution.
Not married to tube or SS..
Always wonder about Stereophile recommended components such as Aesthetix Atlas, Parasound JC-1, CJ LP-125 and the likes. I would pay about $5k on Agon so there are some limitations.
Thanks.
Would like to hear views on Best Amp for Timbre, Depth and Spatial Resolution.
Not married to tube or SS..
Always wonder about Stereophile recommended components such as Aesthetix Atlas, Parasound JC-1, CJ LP-125 and the likes. I would pay about $5k on Agon so there are some limitations.
Thanks.
- ...
- 149 posts total
- 149 posts total