Everyone knows it’s BY FAR better to A/B test with instantaneous switching than relying on memory and what you think you heard.
Well, no, that is not the case at all.
First of all what you suggest is impossible. Even instantaneous switching still the goal is comparing. With what? With what you heard. When? In the past. Where’s the past? In memory. Nowhere else.
You simply haven’t thought this one through. Not at all.
Which aspects of the sound? Well how do you even begin to answer that one? By thinking over the different aspects. Which involves what, again? Memory.
All you’re doing with this instantaneous switching malarkey is moving the proverbial runner halfway to the finish line. You know the story, right? To get to the finish line he must go halfway, then halfway, then half of that.... never gets there. When in reality, WHOOSH! Right on by.
That’s exactly what you’re doing. Inventing some nonexistent constraint, insisting its real. When in reality, WHOOSH! Right on by.
Besides, what about warm-up? Break-in? Acoustic treatments? What about differences between recordings? Do you now require duplicate identical turntables just to decide which LP is better?
Its really just beyond silly.
Especially since, if the difference isn’t big enough you can still be sure after the 5 minutes it takes to change something out, then why would you care anyway? Answer me that one.
I would have thought there was something practical on the market already.
Well, there would be. If it would serve any purpose. Which it doesn't. So its not.
But seriously, the question stands: If you can't be sure after a few minutes then why do you care?