Bryston or Classe for NHT 3.3

i used to own NHT gear (2.9's, 1.5's, super one's, super zeros) for my ausio room and still use an ac-2 and pair of sub two's in my home theater room. i used to get fatigue with the 2.9's after a short period of time. i tried many different amps with the 2.9s (even bi-amping them with their own sa-3 amp) and the best amps that helped in the fatigue were: mcintosh, classe, and odyssey. i used a mcintosh 6500 integrated for months but was not powerful enough. if the mcintosh 6900 would have come out at that time, i would have bought this, it would have driven them without issues. i sold all my nht speakers in my audio rooms and went with totem. no fatigue at all, just smooth sound.
good luck

I have used a Bryston 4bst and a classe ca200 with 2.9's. The Classe was a better match. The Bryston was too bright with these speakers for my taste. You would be better of with at least a ca300 with these speakers if you have a large room, The ca200 would go into protection if I really cranked up the volume. The Classe was also more powerful than the Bryston.

Thanks guys.

I don't have any problems with the 2.9's (B&K amp) as far as fatigue is concerned. Love them, they will make good surround speakers for hirez music.

The first one on my list was/is actually the Classe, since it is known for a "warmer" sound. All a matter of taste I guess, since there are also people who like the Bryston/NHT combination.

The CA 300 is certainly on my list.

I used the BAT vk300x se for a month with the 2.9's and the sound and control were very pleasing and although nothing is ever the BEST, the combo with vinyl(Shure) and cd(Genki) was of that "first rate" experience we all dream of and if we stay with the hobby sometimes witness. IC's= Red Dawn; MAINS= Blue Heaven or AQ Granite. The BAT was a demo and I felt the right 6h30 was not so super at least compared to the left so I returned(cried) it. Also used MF 3.2 and Arcam FMJ ints. and they were nice but not up to the challenge. Vintage Kenwood KA7100 (DC,twin power supplies pure class A integrated 55w/ch measured @ 85 by J Hirsch) blew those two outta here but not as powerful as the BAT indicates that strong class A's would be good also. Next trip to Vestal ny I'll take a pair of 2.5's to Audio Classics to try the MAC 6900 which gets great recommendations by NHT 2.9 owners on the forums. McIntosh has a tube version of 6900 (100w/ch) new this year which also holds great promise.Anything electrically said about 2.9 is exactly true for 3.3 as they use the exact same drivers (only the cone size 10" vs 12" is different, same motor) 3.3's need to come away from the walls more,NHT web has Kantors' placement recommendations. 2.5i is harder to drive so anything good for them is better for 2.9/3.3's. Classe are good, but my experience is limited with 3.3.

I would recommend the Classe for the NHTs. IMO, the Brystons/NHT combo are just too fatiguing with music. I use to have a 9b driving my VT3s but I was always tweaking it. My current Sim Titan worked a little better but I finally sold mt NHTs.