Cartridges: Complete Scam?

Dear @frogman : What I said about professional musicians was not in reference to timing subject. Was only a fact that I found out, nothing more than that.

The whole comparison between audio and live music is a " sea " of diferent characteristics  and that's why, even that live music is my reference, I say that we audiophiles will enjoy better the listening experiences in our room/system as nearer that system is to the recording.

I think that exist one advantage on what the recording microphones pick up during process and that is " detail " due that good microphones have a very wide frequency range and " support " high SPL. In these regards the mics. could be better than our ears but even here is very complicated to have precise conclusions.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.

Dear @chakster : Very informative video, thank's.

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.

Every jump in price level I have made cartridge wise has seen a significant improvement in all musical factors, at each change.  people are just  blowing smoke, or can't hear for beans, or don't know how to listen.  Same for amps; some say amps don't matter, they do.  One day I substituted  in an  NAD amp for a Parasound  A-23, and had noticeable bass smearing.  One day listening to Eric Clapton, I could tell highs were wrong.  Can't explain how I came to conclusion it was speaker cables, but I did.  Went from 4PR to 8TC, and the highs were there.  Similar experience with inter connects.  To get SS to match sound of tubes will costs you at least 5 times as much.  Those who want SS amp with tube pre are losing out unless it's an expensive SS amp.  Wont say there isn't some snake oil out there, cause there is, but not on your opening issue.

Raymonda from months ago.  I own a Benz Ruby 3 since 2006 ($3000).  It is mounted on a what once sold for $1100 arm, the SME IV (modified).  It last sold for about $4,000 a few years ago.  So, I had a 30 year old arm with a 12 year old cartridge on a VPI TNT VI.   
I consider this less than SOTA but high-end.  The reason I am still using the cartridge after 2500+ hours is cleanliness (stylus cleaned with a Magic Eraser every record side), mostly clean LPs, proper VTF and VTA (set-up).  I will continue to use this expensive cartridge until it does show signs of wear (maybe another 500+ hours).  The point is that expensive cartridges can last a long time and provide so many hours of enjoyment that the annual cost is greatly reduced and I don't feel the need to "upgrade" from here.  Plus, the initial cost of a high quality arm in the 80s became inflated as everyone noted.  

Also, the lack of smog in the past 15 years in the NW San Fernando Valley (previously the smog capital of the country was L.A.) does not destroy the rubber parts of the cartridge like it did in the 60's to the 80's when my expensive Dynavector's died after 3 short years (stylus was fine, the cantilevers froze from hardened rubber mounting).   

This thread has been amusing and aggravating to me, at the same time.  The OP obviously came from a confrontational direction and shows quite a bit of arrogance and close-mindedness to boot.

The responses focusing on cartridge/tonearm  compatability supplied the most important perspective necessary.  I cannot attest to current products as I am one of those 'old vintage dinosaurs who  live in the past'.  My two TTs are mid-70s  Technics direct drive SL-1300 and SL-1350.  My cartridge line of preference is Audio Technica MM.  My best cartridges were all made between 1975 and 1982, and were designed to be compatible with tonearms of that era.  I have recently added to my cartridge collection a few Signet TK9s, a TK10, and an At25; all with NOS stylii.  Their sound production is a definite step up in clarity and depth of sound stage, but I would be averse to calling them the absolute best.  The incredible detail of these carts can sometimes be fatiguing over long listening sessions.  However, my Signet TK7lca or AT14sa will provide hours of pleasant enjoyment over a wide range of source material.  Not everything has to be better or worse.  'Different' is ok.

BTW, the speed stability on my two TTs is rock solid.  They both are supported with acoustic isolators...checked regularly for level positioning.  VTA, VTF, AZ are all carefully checked with each cartridge swap.  All records are washed in the Spin-Clean, finalized with a vintage Disc Washer, and stylus brushed after each side is played.  Why do I mention this, you might ask?  Because the previous care enables me to listen to vinyl that is a quiet as a cd.  Period.  I am a dyed-in-the-wool believer of keeping the basics solid.  Purchase the best compatible equipment I can AFFORD initially, set it up to the best of my ability, and then care for it as if it were the last stereo on Earth. 

Maybe the OP will gain some education and maturity in the coming years, and learn that cubic dollars are not the solution to every problem he encounters.

just my $0.02