2. amps-preamps
  3. 1292431159

Compare Parasound 2100 vs. Parasound P3 preamps

I recently sold a P3 Halo preamp because the phono section was just so-so. I now have an opportunity to purchase a used Parasound 2100.

Does anyone know if performance of the 2100 phono section is sonically better than the P3? I have a Parasound 2200 power amp pushing a pair of B&W Nautilus 802 and occasionally a pair of B&W 803S. I just love the combination. I currently use a McCormack TLC-1 as preamp.

I am looking at the Parasound 2100 for use with my turntable.
morgandogge
bizango1
276 posts
 
Call Parasound. I called to ask about the differences between the P3 & P7 and the top guy there answered the phone-I can't remember his name. He was really nice and helpful and described the specific differences and their effects in detail.
jorgeparrapuppy
257 posts
 
Bizango: Can you tell us what those differences and effects are, please?

jorge
morgandogge OP
16 posts
 
Thanks, Bizango1. Richard at ext. 13 in Parasound tech support indicated that the P3 was developed in 2000-01 while the 2100 was developed more recently. Therefore the 2100 is a much better preamp, phono section and all, than the P3.
bizango1
276 posts
 
Jorgeparrapuppy, sorry but I don't remember the details because it was a while ago. He recommended the P7 when he learned that I was most interested in sound quality in a 2 channel rig as it has better parts, design, etc. More money, naturally! I ended up downsizing to an integrated by Wyred4Sound instead but never got the chance to audition the P7.
jorgeparrapuppy
257 posts
 
Bizango: Thanks for the response. And I apologize for hijacking the thread. How do you like your integrated?
More to discover