Herman
I took that to mean you disagreed that current was the flow of charges since I don't see any other way to read that statement.
I don't see how you could have taken it that way.
The original poster claimed that current was the flow of charge, not electrons. I said that was incorrect, that current was indeed the flow of electrons and reminded him that electrons were the charge carriers. In other words, in the context here, electrons and charge were one and the same.
If that is not what you meant then I apologize.
No problem.
By the way, what happened to the rest of your post? When I read it the fist time, I recall your saying something about positive charge carriers in materials other than metals.