Eminent Technology ET-2 Tonearm Owners



Where are you? What mods have you done ?

I have been using these ET2's for over 9 years now.
I am still figuring them out and learning from them. They can be modified in so many ways. Bruce Thigpen laid down the GENIUS behind this tonearm over 20 years ago. Some of you have owned them for over 20 years !

Tell us your secrets.

New owners – what questions do you have ?

We may even be able to coax Bruce to post here. :^)

There are so many modifications that can be done.

Dressing of the wire with this arm is critical to get optimum sonics along with proper counterweight setup.

Let me start it off.

Please tell us what you have found to be the best wire for the ET-2 tonearm ? One that is pliable/doesn’t crink or curl. Whats the best way of dressing it so it doesn’t impact the arm. Through the spindle - Over the manifold - Below manifold ? What have you come up with ?
128x128ct0517
...... another important factor. I, as I'm sure you all are aware, from decades of listening, the effects of certain materials on sound quality. This is where most of us have experience that novices don't or will have to wait for, until these important factors can properly be evaluated in your projects. This is where time listening, experience, and most of all, patience is critical in going forward with aftermarket projects.
Slaw.
It will be intersting to read about your TT project.
Re the arm pod and pillar, perhaps I have missunderstood?
If the arm pod has three adjustable feet it would be possible to replicate the effect of the three feet currently used by Bruce in the arm pillar. It would be easy enough to replicate the curved VTA arrangement of the pillar in a one piece pillar / pod. The three adjustable feet would need to employ finer threads on the screws to avoid them being too coarse in adjustment due to the longer fulcrum. Is this an option?

Agree with you on the acrylic thing. It can have the negative effects you describe. I think that a lot of this has to do with how it is used though. That said if/when I build another TT, I will almost certainly use a different plinth material. Probably durallium or austenetic cast iron.

I use discarded surface plates under the TT and Pre for their vibrational energy transmitting characteristic. They then sit on soft wood and sand which should dissipate this energy. Like you, the original TT and Arm made extensive use of other surface plates, during the build process, to ensure their trueness.

It is great to read about people taking the big step of commiting time and effort to a major project like yours.


Slaw
"I do agree with Fremer that this (acrylic) isn't the best material for great transient response, tight, controlled musical bass @ realistic sound that I crave."

Interestingly, last night, I stumbled on the following comment re the VPI Scout 1.1 platter (Joel Salcido, TAS 40th anniversary issue): This one is Not acrylic and to hear Harry (Weisfeld) tell it, acrylic platters are a thing of the past. It's simply easier to machine metal to tighter tolerances, and the fact they sound better ices the cake.

Back in the Goldmund days, I understood their acrylic platter was for optimum impedance matching (with vinyl). Life moves on huh.
Slaw
"I have to say that as regards to using acrylic as a platform for the vinyl record ......"

Further reading, TAS 40th issue.
Wayne Garcia on the new Rega RP8:

"Most notable is a two-piece, 16mm thick flywheel platter made of float glass, a technique wherein molten glass is Floated over molten tin in order to create the flattest possible surface and overall uniformity of thickness. To form the flywheel platter, Rega joins two separate pieces of float glass to the underside .... adding mass to the circumference.

Damn marvellous I say!