2. speakers
  3. 1092333957

ESS and Heil air-motion tranformer - any thoughts?

These seem like interesting speakers, has anyone on this board had any experience with the ESS line of speakers?

A.M.T. description:

"The Heil diaphragm, made of soft, quiet mylar to reduce background noise, is bonded with conductive aluminum strips. It is equivalent in surface area to a conventional cone type eight inch midrange driver, but is accordion-folded down to a compact one-inch band for better point source dispersion. The low mass diaphragm is suspended in a massive magnet structure concentrating an intense magnetic field around the diaphragm.

When a signal passes through the aluminum strips, the bellows-like motion of the folded "pleats" squeezes air out five times faster then the air motion of a conventional cone driver. The virtual "instant acceleration" provides high definition, crisp transients, and overall spaciousness with superb dynamic range. This type of performance distinguishes the heil from all other transducers."

http://www.essspeakers.com/
128x128dawgbyte
rbstehno
1,454 posts
 
i bought a pair back in 1978. used them for years and I liked them very much up until the early 90's. i recently sold them (been in my closet for many years) 5 months ago for $250.
trelja
3,223 posts
 
I have a pair of them in my family room, in the corners. They're my father's, and that's what the conventional wisdom of the day told one to place the speakers. The woofers are now suffering from rotted foam, for the second time. He bought some woofers to drop in there this summer. It will be interesting to give them a listen once he fixes them. My recollection was that some of the midrange and maybe all of the treble sounded very, very good. But, I have not listened to them in yeeeeearrrrrsss.
mrmb's avatar
mrmb
299 posts
 
Still have my AMT-3's ("RockMonitors") from the 1973/74 time frame. Their configuration consisted of the Air Motion Transformer, a 5" mid range and (2) 10" drivers.

Up until a few years ago, they were used in a HT system, but are currently in my son's seldom played, and never critically, 2nd.system.

The 10" drivers were re-coned twice, and then totally replaced.

If someone knew their way around speaker design, replacing the crossover and the (3) drivers with "matched" ones, would probably substantially improve a so-so speaker.

The lack of synergy between the standard drivers and the Transformer were the speaker's weakness, but in the 70's, when loud was good, and louder was better, the AMT's driven by a Phase Linear 400 were a lot of fun.

BTW, I still am using the 1978 Phase Linear Model 400 Series II to drive rear channels in a 7.1 HT set-up.
Ag insider logo xs@2x
hammy
176 posts
 
trelja- you don't have to replace the woofers- which can hurt the sound if it's the wrong woofer for the cabinet (Q factor) - you can re-foam what you have!
http://www.simplyspeakers.com/2doityourself.htm
valinar
473 posts
 
I had a pair of ESS amt-1a bookshelf speakers for about 25 years. In October 2003 I replaced them with a pair of Paradigm Studio 40 v.3's. The ESS had plenty of high end and bass. When I had them I thought the high end was clear. The Paradigm's are far clearer. The bass in the ESS is mushy. The Paradigm has a better punch. When it comes to midrange I feel there is no comparison. The Paradigm's are far superior.
More to discover