fuses - the $39 ones or the 85 cent ones

If one is going to replace their power cord and buy gold fuses, it seems that this is all for naught without replacing the Romex from the outlet to the panel.

By that logic, there should be no need for high quality copper wire and good parts when the utility company uses common aluminum for the high tension lines in the alley that supply our system.

You need to think about the fuse as the weak link in the AC chain rather than picking at the Romex or AC cable.

Yes, changing the Romex to 6, 9's large gauge copper would probably benefit the system but so does the AC cord and fuse, with or without the Romex swap.

When I raced cars there were people who argued that this cam and gear combo would not work and then got their ass beat at the end of the track. Sometimes you just have to get your hands dirty and try things to prove it works.

By the way, the word "Romex" is a brand name, like "Kleenex".

Just a brief update to my previous post in which I challenged Mr. Kaits as to whom the Audiogon community would trust and/or consider more credible him or me.

In a series of "spirited" email exchanges in which I defended the readership's experience and knowledge, my friend had this to say about forum members:

"Now there's a group of distiction. Not exactly the faculty of Harvard. If you know what I mean. LOL".

So folks, here you have a fellow talking out of both sides of his mouth. Advertising and selling products here to a group he totally disdains.

Caveat Emptor.

Magfan, I do agree that $39 is germain if the fuses thing is total BS, but if not I would think it is worth it, even if the production costs are $1. For now I'll just stay with Roger Modjeski's advice and Isanchez' experience
and use the ceramic fuses - the reasons for using them instead of glass fuses to make a lot of sense, even to my non-techncial mind. But I'll keep the HiFi Tuning ones in my transport and DAC, unless someone wants to by them cheap - $38?

I would like to stress the fact that the HiFi-Tuning fuses don't seem to be tested and approved by any agency here in the US, Europe or Asia.

There is a very good reason for common electrical products to be tested and certified by UL, SA, etc. This testing and approval process is what guarantees that a particular electrical product is in fact developed and manufactured following a rigorous standard. The only information I could find is that the HiFi-Tuning fuses are hand-made and tested in Germany, which doesn't say much about manufacturing standards, testing, etc. If they have had an independent testing and approval process, then they should convey that information for the user's peace of mind.

The main role of fuses is to protect your equipment and they should definitely be manufactured under some sort of oversight by an independent agency. Without this, there is little assurance that the product will actually perform its main role, which is again to protect your electrical equipment from failure. The sound characteristic of the fuse should not take priority over its safety role.

Forgive the redundancy, but a fuse should never fail to fail, IMO.

Agreed that a fuse 'should never fail to fail'.
I wonder what the truth of certification (UL, SA, etc) is?

A REACH: I suspect it costs a Bundle to get a certification.
YOU, the manufacturer pay for the tests and must supply all the samples. In the automotive world, that is how it is for motor oil. There is some non-certified oil out there which is also very good. A few types of Amsoil used to be like this.

Now, manufacturing can also be certified. The company I work for, in semicondutor processing, undergoes periodic Independent Audits. We are also ISO certified. If the HiFi-Tuning fuse folk are so certified, I would not hesitate to purchase there stuff....Of course, I still think that 39$ for a fuse of only anecdotal help is ridiculous. But, if they have undergone independent audits OR are ISO certified, than I believe the fuse would indeed act like a fuse.

It would than be up to the Lawyers to decide....in the event of some kind of failure causing damage to life or property.

As for being 'manufactured under some sort of oversight by an independenty agency' ?? I hope you Do Not mean Government? If those guys made cookies, we'd all be dead.