observations do not concur with established theory
approach 1. conclusion: observations are flawed
outcome: status quo preserved
approach 2. conclusion: further investigation is warranted
new or modified theory proposed that aligns with observations
theory tested >
null hypothesis formulated, rejected or not,
theory rejected, theory accepted for further testing, theory modified or new theory proposed,
theory tested > …etc etc.. outcome: Scientific progress is made, even if we reject 10 hypotheses
my own experiments have lead me to conclude that there are things going on within electrical fields that theory clearly states shouldn‘t, and based on the anecdotal reports of many audiophiles I am not alone. I view this as an opportunity for scientific advancement rather than something to be dismissed in a condescending manner.
There are just too many people independently reporting similar findings for them to be dismissed out of hand.