Has anyone made the jump to $uper High end and were disappointed?

If you call expensive products highend, it is even insane. Because many products proof to have nothing to do with how music and voices and instruments sounds in reality.

They want to create the idea that expensice is good, but the facts proof that money does not garantee you anything.

What do you want to achieve in audio? What do you want to offer to people who spend a lot of their money on audio?

I think you should give them the best they can get for their hard earn money. But when the focus these days is more regarding on how we can earn as much money as possible. You will limit yourself at the end more and more.

People need to learn to look further.........for manufacturers this counts even more than for customers. They are the ones who can change the audio world and how to create  better products and new ideas.

Huh? But nobody is saying all expensive audiophile products are great. In the case of Audioquest and many other audio companies, their products have a range of prices, as someone noted, including the $uper Expensive audiophile products - which is actually the subject of this thread, I.e., is anybody DISAPPOINTED WITH A MOVE TO THE SUPER EXPENSIVE HIGH END?

Obviously, as least to most dedicated audiophiles, there is a whole lot more to the hobby besides buying a bunch of expensive stuff and plugging it into the wall.

Most likely the new Audioquest Hurricane power cord at almost $2K for 2m Cord would qualify as $uper High End just based on cost.

“A rich audiophile has about as much chance of entering Audio Nirvana as a camel 🐪 has of passing through the eye 👁 of a needle.”- Old audiophile axiom

When you read this discussion well, you should have read that trial and error is the most important part what limits most people. Trial and error is pure audiogamblind based on facts.

I had many duscussions about this with people who also work in audio. And they all admit that it is not that precise. Only when you have not the insight and knowledge to look further you will go on to do audio this way.

You only can use Audioquest cables and the same counts for other brands maximum when you understand the properties and what it does in an audio system.

Cables are tested just by audiogambling. And you can hear that the endresult changed. But this is extreemly ineffective. Because you still don’t know why your stage and sound is what you hear.

This means you drive a boat but you have no idea how to guide it to the place you want to go. People have no idea how limit the part is of the whole quality a cable could create if you would use the full potential.

My clients buy cables at the importancy level of a component. This means I creatre shootouts for them that I can create a bigger step with a cable compared to change to a different component.

Most people overhere cannot even imagine this. This proofs that trial and error give totaaly different endresults compared to creating audio by Tru-Fi.

Perfectionists always want their clients to get the best value for the money they want to spend. And you can only spend the amount one time.

So we create ideas what will give them the biggest step. I love to outperfrom audioshops. Each selling option for me is like a game. And I only want to win.

Tru-Fi is superior in effectness compared to any silly kind of trial and error. For me it is so easy to outperfrom other shops over and over again. What they can offer for me it is so easy to overrule it.

Even with cables I proved to outperform component options of competitors. Audio for me will always be a battle against children.

Children have less knowledge and experience of many situations they don’t have experienced yet. Trial and error also does not give you the information to understand it what you are doing.

When I am at an audioshow I always start to count the faults they made. And mannn the lists are long. Thousands of tests in almost 20 years gave me superior insight and knowledge to understand both sound&vision.

I can see and hear that they only can see to a very limit level in details. Because they have no idea what they do wrong. They never went sofar into details.