I would love to hear your system, Halcro; and have no doubt that it sounds fantastic. Â If I am ever in your neck of the woods Iâll be sure to let you know.
The issue of âsuperiorityâ is a tricky one, imo.  For me, the respective sounds of, in this case, two truly excellent components get to a point when âsuperiorityâ is determined by superiority in specific areas that are sonic priorities; even when the other component does better in areas which are not sonic priorities.  I wrote:
**** Sound staging excellence takes a back seat for me no matter how impressive or fun it may be with another cartridge. ****
You wrote:
**** The sheer size, height and depth of the image created.
The pinpoint imaging.
The transparency.
The shimmering highs and realistic lows. ****
As you have stated, or suggested, several times previously and as the above comment seems to prioritize, sound staging is extremely important for you. Â Less so for me. Â I am sure that we can agree that the soundstaging with the Decca is at least very good. Â I think we can then take those considerations off the table for the sake of this discussion. Â Tonal considerations then become what determines for me which is âsuperiorâ. Â Based on this and previous comparisons I would say that you prefer a sound with a lower midrange/upper bass range that is a little more prominent than would be my preference. Â Nothing wrong with that at all. Â I feel that even a little too much prominence in that range, and especially if not well integrated and tonally consistent with the midrange obscures midrange nuance which is the most important aspect of sound for me. Â This is the reason that I continue to suffer the bass inadequacies of my beloved Stax F81âs. Â I have not heard a more tonally truthful midrange. Â
The sound with the Decca pushes some of the same buttons for me. Â There is something simply tonally correct about its sound in the context of your system as heard this way. Â Perhaps âin situâ it would be different, but my priorities would still be the same. Â If you ever tire of the Decca, feel free to send it to me; I think Dover already has dibs on the Sony âșïž. Â What an amazing collection of cartridges you have. Â Congrats! Â
Iâll give the Strauss a listen shortly. Â One of my very favorite composers and certainly not under appreciated in my book.
Best wishes.
The issue of âsuperiorityâ is a tricky one, imo.  For me, the respective sounds of, in this case, two truly excellent components get to a point when âsuperiorityâ is determined by superiority in specific areas that are sonic priorities; even when the other component does better in areas which are not sonic priorities.  I wrote:
**** Sound staging excellence takes a back seat for me no matter how impressive or fun it may be with another cartridge. ****
You wrote:
**** The sheer size, height and depth of the image created.
The pinpoint imaging.
The transparency.
The shimmering highs and realistic lows. ****
As you have stated, or suggested, several times previously and as the above comment seems to prioritize, sound staging is extremely important for you. Â Less so for me. Â I am sure that we can agree that the soundstaging with the Decca is at least very good. Â I think we can then take those considerations off the table for the sake of this discussion. Â Tonal considerations then become what determines for me which is âsuperiorâ. Â Based on this and previous comparisons I would say that you prefer a sound with a lower midrange/upper bass range that is a little more prominent than would be my preference. Â Nothing wrong with that at all. Â I feel that even a little too much prominence in that range, and especially if not well integrated and tonally consistent with the midrange obscures midrange nuance which is the most important aspect of sound for me. Â This is the reason that I continue to suffer the bass inadequacies of my beloved Stax F81âs. Â I have not heard a more tonally truthful midrange. Â
The sound with the Decca pushes some of the same buttons for me. Â There is something simply tonally correct about its sound in the context of your system as heard this way. Â Perhaps âin situâ it would be different, but my priorities would still be the same. Â If you ever tire of the Decca, feel free to send it to me; I think Dover already has dibs on the Sony âșïž. Â What an amazing collection of cartridges you have. Â Congrats! Â
Iâll give the Strauss a listen shortly. Â One of my very favorite composers and certainly not under appreciated in my book.
Best wishes.