"I mean, really, a power cord for $6000? Really? Really?
That power cable only exists because someone entepenuer knew if he built it fancy, packaged it well and marketed it to the easily swayed, he could sell enough to make a killing"
Perhaps you should consider that who you refer to as the "easily swayed" is more accurately yourself who is "easily swayed" by the notion that for some arbitrary reason of yours $6,000 is apparently too much to spend on a power cable. Perhaps those who buy the $6,000 power cables are not especially "easily swayed" at all, but are making a consumer choice with which they are comfortable whereas in your case it would be a purchase that would make you uncomfortable perhaps if only because such a consumer purchase would be beyond your budget.
The concept that there is something defective about those who might spend $6,000 on a power cable is actually a form of prejudice about someone you have obviously not met and whose budgetary and financial realities differ from yours to such an extent that you are unable to comprehend how they could possibly execute such a purchase and remain rational and yet at the same time you call them "easily swayed" so obviously you have a flaw in your "logic" here.
Moreover if we examine this "easily swayed" person who's behavior you conjure from your fertile imagination you might ask yourself that if indeed this person is so "easily swayed" how is it that they have $6,000 to spend on a power cable rather than having already spent it on some other tomfoolery such as pricey cars or truckloads of Girl Scout cookies? After all they are so "easily swayed" how is it that the $6,000 power cable has so "easily swayed" their decision whereas other beckoning consumer products have failed to absorb their expendable $6,000?