Hi gdhal,
You stated:
" Hi Tim.
So by your own admission, your LG 86SJ9570 ***MATCHES*** the picture quality of my Samsung UN65KS9800.
So again, whats so obvious?"
I think we need to straighten out a few things to keep things clear:
1. Shadorne summed it up precisely when he replied:
"
The LG 86SJ9570 amd UN65KS9800 are both LED TVs and both Samsung and LG are competitive - so not much difference. However the 86inch would be impressive because of the size. Great choice."
The LG 86J9570 is the 86" LED hdtv that the OP,
vasubandu, stated that he has already decided to buy. It is not the hdtv that I own but I too believe it's a very good choice for the OP due to its visually impressive 86" size and the fact it can be purchased for about $10-15K less than the comparable Samsung of similar size.
2. As I've stated several times in this thread, the Samsung UN65K9800 that you own is a very good LED/LCD hdtv that has received numerous well deserved good reviews. But, even in one of these good reviews like the 4K review you previously linked to, there is this statement:
"
Only the LG G6 Signature OLED 4K TV or perhaps it’s close cousin the E6 could beat this particular Samsung model in terms of sheer overall display quality and we are definitely impressed."
I've owned a Panasonic 65" VT60 plasma hdtv for the last 3 years but I've continued to keep current on home video developments via the internet and frequent visits to local A/V stores. From all I've read and personally viewed, the very best picture quality currently available is definitely provided by the latest 4K OLED hdtvs with HDR. It's considered to be superior to every other video technology in pq not just by myself, but also by the vast majority of professional video reviewers and calibrators.
It really is that obvious to the majority of humans.
I have no idea why you are unable to recognize OLED's obvious pq superiority.
Tim