HELP B&W 802D or Revel Ultima Salon2

All of the above is true, and this is why B&W is a premier speaker company. However, I feel the Revels are the better speaker, at a higher price though. For $15000 (retail) you get quite a lot of speaker for the money with the B&Ws. The same can be said for the Revels. So, to me it just depends on what you're looking for in a speaker. The Revels are more neutral and accurate, imo. But, the B&Ws have better bass, imo. It's kind of a toss up, really! lol.

Mr M here is the frequency responce:
http://www.stereophile.com/content/bw-802d-loudspeaker-measurements

People can make up their own mind about the amount of bass hump there is - I describe it as about 10 db from where it dips below 0 db but I won't get into an argument about it. Regardless of how you look at it such a hump is not the mark of a genuinely neutral speaker. All I am doing is pointing out some people don't like them - of which I am one. I could say have you ever thought the reason for that is they are crap - but I won't because I understand from listening to gear over many years with others how much personal preferences comes into it and there is no right or wrong here. All I am pointing out is if you are spending that sort of money you owe it to yourself to listen to other gear in that price range - that's it that's all. Oh and there were quite a few people in this thread that did not address a direct comparison. This often happens when someone posts about two specific products - some posts just address one or speak in general terms.

Thanks
Bill

Baranowski wrote 'The constant debate over B&W speakers is nuts'

Mate there is no debate really - they simply polarize a bit - that's all. Some love em - some find them ho hum for all sorts of reasons. I had a guy over while visiting a friend in Canberra who has the same speakers I have and who had just been at a B&W dealer that was gushing how great they were - he personally couldn't stand them for reasons I will not repeat. He liked my speakers a lot better. But another guy I know wrote me saying he was very concerned about all the negative comments about B&W but loved them - it was giving him pause about pulling the trigger. I had to explain to both there is no right or wrong here - there is a wide variety of tastes in Hi Fi - viva la difference I say.

Hear them and make up you own mind and check out other speakers as well so you have a baseline. Its that simple - nothing hard about it at all. No need for arguments, getting upset or anything.

All the OP needs to know is the B&W's polarize in opinion so be sure they are what you want before getting them.

Thanks
Bill

Reviving an old thread, amazingly, all these ears later the ultima2 line is still current; it's spanned the end of the B&W "D1" (simply known as D) , the 2011-2016 B&W "D2" (simply known as Diamond), and now the 2016-present "D3".
So the General consensus is that both the 802D2 and Salon2 are fabulous, however most people seem to prefer the revel salon2. Fast forward to summer 2017 now, the salon2 is still current, how do folks feel about salon2 versus the current 802D3?

@tubesrule Great question! I recently had the opportunity to hear both the Salon2 and 802D3 back to back - powered by Levinson 536 amp + 519 player.

The Salons sounded invisible, effortless, and natural to me. The 802d3 sounded boomy at the bottom and a bit shrill at the top. The Revel+Levinson synergy is tough to beat. And no, I don't work for Harman :)

My 2¢ - no refunds!