Stefanl,
You're right about those numbers of course. The 103's real compliance has been known for many years, long before John Ellison ever posted about it.
My guidance was not based on arm/cart resonance calculations, which are only useful for avoiding gross incompatibilities. Actual performance is better assessed by listening, and my guidance was based on that.
I've used the stock 103/103R in arms with effective masses ranging from 10-11g (including Rega) up to 18g or so. Does it work on the lighter arms? Sure. Does it work optimally? No, not even close.
I assume the OP is looking for the best performance for his money.
You're right about those numbers of course. The 103's real compliance has been known for many years, long before John Ellison ever posted about it.
My guidance was not based on arm/cart resonance calculations, which are only useful for avoiding gross incompatibilities. Actual performance is better assessed by listening, and my guidance was based on that.
I've used the stock 103/103R in arms with effective masses ranging from 10-11g (including Rega) up to 18g or so. Does it work on the lighter arms? Sure. Does it work optimally? No, not even close.
I assume the OP is looking for the best performance for his money.