I find that class D amplifier module designers or companies of that nature are looking to ’commoditize’ audio amplifiers and place themselves at the top of that ’food chain’ that they are building.
As the quality of class d rises, then more and more ears are going to find that they sound not best, but ’good enough’
when that happens, and it is happening..and you can see it in all the class d threads...when that happens, then the ’war’ for quality will be over, and then we will have two or three brands of amplifiers, for ’the great unwashed high end audio masses’.
and those two or three companies will use ’box builders’ as fame and fortune aggrandizers, or ’beasts of burden’ for THEIR module producing fame, where the box builders are invariably pushed to being simple minded idiots, capable of nothing... who are just resellers of Coke or Pepsi. Like computer builders, who use branded cards power supplies and cases..and whatnot ..for making computers.
Skilled? sort of. Barely.
But, it will happen, as there is money on the table and some will step in and be that box builder and be that maker of fortunes ---for the given class d module maker.
I know this is true as for most of the module makers, at least so far in my contacts..none of them will sell product to anyone who tries to modify or change their modules to make that box builder the preferred choice among box builders.
These class d modules are NOT PERFECT. No matter what hype may come from what company for whatever claim maybe made about perfection. As they will come out with another module tomorrow... and that new one will suddenly be ’the perfect one’.
Basically, they are iterating like they did before... and before... and before... and before...
Yet each claim is a stinky claim of audio perfection, yet each one gets replaced..
They want to sell highly branded COKE or PEPSI to YOU and to have you ignore the lowly beast of burden... and concentrate on them, the module builder.
So, I can improve their modules. Its easy. every single module I’ve seen from anyone has design flaws, design choices... that could be better and do a better job of serving the music... and and sound better than they do. I’ve got the talent and the understandings in place through about 40 years of work, to see many of those flaws, to know exactly where they lie, and what to do about them.
I’ve done it before and folks have recognized that when the given class D modules I worked on where at shows, and people hard them and said it was the best class d they’ve ever heard.
But, if I were to change that module... then you might notice... and then the next OEM box pusher might suffer in sales. As I’ve got the better module, as I’ve improved it.
I have to tell them what I plan to do with the module. I have to.I have to say it clearly, and upfront . As I can’t afford to do al the intellectual work, and make the changes, begin selling the amps, and then have access pulled.
In that scenario, I’d have all the work done..out there..and then that work stolen and used by others. and I receive nothing for all my years of study, effort, and work. Zero.
So, this ’difference’ is bad for the module company, and for bad for their ’other’ clientele. I can see their point. If I were them, I’d probably see it the same way.
And I am forbidden to buy from them for OEM use. For the sin of making the module better.
They’ve built themselves a trap. Where the customer gets the short end of the stick, especially if the customer wants the best.
It is all...basically...a steaming pile. A giant steaming pile.
I can’t give you a better class D amplifier, as I’m locked out from doing so.
How do you like them apples?
As the quality of class d rises, then more and more ears are going to find that they sound not best, but ’good enough’
when that happens, and it is happening..and you can see it in all the class d threads...when that happens, then the ’war’ for quality will be over, and then we will have two or three brands of amplifiers, for ’the great unwashed high end audio masses’.
and those two or three companies will use ’box builders’ as fame and fortune aggrandizers, or ’beasts of burden’ for THEIR module producing fame, where the box builders are invariably pushed to being simple minded idiots, capable of nothing... who are just resellers of Coke or Pepsi. Like computer builders, who use branded cards power supplies and cases..and whatnot ..for making computers.
Skilled? sort of. Barely.
But, it will happen, as there is money on the table and some will step in and be that box builder and be that maker of fortunes ---for the given class d module maker.
I know this is true as for most of the module makers, at least so far in my contacts..none of them will sell product to anyone who tries to modify or change their modules to make that box builder the preferred choice among box builders.
These class d modules are NOT PERFECT. No matter what hype may come from what company for whatever claim maybe made about perfection. As they will come out with another module tomorrow... and that new one will suddenly be ’the perfect one’.
Basically, they are iterating like they did before... and before... and before... and before...
Yet each claim is a stinky claim of audio perfection, yet each one gets replaced..
They want to sell highly branded COKE or PEPSI to YOU and to have you ignore the lowly beast of burden... and concentrate on them, the module builder.
So, I can improve their modules. Its easy. every single module I’ve seen from anyone has design flaws, design choices... that could be better and do a better job of serving the music... and and sound better than they do. I’ve got the talent and the understandings in place through about 40 years of work, to see many of those flaws, to know exactly where they lie, and what to do about them.
I’ve done it before and folks have recognized that when the given class D modules I worked on where at shows, and people hard them and said it was the best class d they’ve ever heard.
But, if I were to change that module... then you might notice... and then the next OEM box pusher might suffer in sales. As I’ve got the better module, as I’ve improved it.
I have to tell them what I plan to do with the module. I have to.I have to say it clearly, and upfront . As I can’t afford to do al the intellectual work, and make the changes, begin selling the amps, and then have access pulled.
In that scenario, I’d have all the work done..out there..and then that work stolen and used by others. and I receive nothing for all my years of study, effort, and work. Zero.
So, this ’difference’ is bad for the module company, and for bad for their ’other’ clientele. I can see their point. If I were them, I’d probably see it the same way.
And I am forbidden to buy from them for OEM use. For the sin of making the module better.
They’ve built themselves a trap. Where the customer gets the short end of the stick, especially if the customer wants the best.
It is all...basically...a steaming pile. A giant steaming pile.
I can’t give you a better class D amplifier, as I’m locked out from doing so.
How do you like them apples?