How Science Got Sound Wrong


I don't believe I've posted this before or if it has been posted before but I found it quite interesting despite its technical aspect. I didn't post this for a digital vs analog discussion. We've beat that horse to death several times. I play 90% vinyl. But I still can enjoy my CD's.  

https://www.fairobserver.com/more/science/neil-young-vinyl-lp-records-digital-audio-science-news-wil...
artemus_5
Exhibit A - Aerospace Engineering, Wikipedia page excerpt

Some of the elements of aerospace engineering are:[16][17]

Abbreviated list for uh, brevity

🔜The basis of most of these elements lies in theoretical physics, such as fluid dynamics for aerodynamics or the equations of motion for flight dynamics. 🔙 There is also a large empirical component. Historically, this empirical component was derived from testing of scale models and prototypes, either in wind tunnels or in the free atmosphere. More recently, advances in computing have enabled the use of computational fluid dynamics to simulate the behavior of the fluid, reducing time and expense spent on wind-tunnel testing. Those studying hydrodynamics or hydroacoustics often obtain degrees in aerospace engineering.

Ma lady geoffkait,


"...poorly understood maladies such as Internet addiction disorder..."

No wonder you are misunderstood.


Isn't it a little early for you to be sitting on your face, glubsong?

geoffkait,


I am sorry, I did not understand that. Can you elaborate?

The amount of effort some people will put into supporting their delusions and dishonesty is really astounding. aerospace ENGineering. Batchelor's level.  The basis of most of semiconductor physics is in theoretical physics ... likely far more than aerospace engineering. That does not mean I studied "theoretical physics", nor does it mean that I have a degree in "theoretical physics". There is a big difference between applying concepts of theoretical physics, which while theoretical, provide more than enough accuracy for engineering tasks, and being an actual theoretical physicist (i.e. the person working on those underlying theories).


For quadrupling down gk, without providing anything viable to refute your claim to be a theoretical physicist, nor to refute you claiming to have a degree in theoretical physics, all you have proven ... is what is wrong with many audiophiles.