Is DEQX a game changer?


Just read a bit and it sure sounds interesting. Does it sound like the best way to upgrade speakers?
ptss
It's important to realize that you do not have to use the speaker correction functionality (the part of the DSP that is best with measurements taken outside).

The DEQX has other functions - digital pre-amp, digital crossover and room correction that make it great even without the speaker correction.

The better the speakers the less improvement from speaker correction (as the drivers will be closer to flat and better pair matched).

With speakers like YG or ATC the improvements from speaker correction are small (but still noticeable).

The sound quality of the DEQX is good enough without speaker correction that I think it stands up as an exceptional product even without turning on the speaker correction.
Thanks Al. I enjoy and appreciate your posts :) In 20's I took a degree in accounting. No math; just use of an adding machine. I enjoyed Philosophy and logic and appreciate yours. KUTGW. Cheers :) Pete
P.S. Al. Dad was a civil engineer--great guy, unbelievable memory. Gave me a wonderful start and although passed in the early 90's is with me near daily. My luck.
Thanks very much, Pete, for the nice words and the interesting comments.

An update: I've created and assessed three more speaker calibration profiles, this time based on the measurements I took with no acoustic panels in place. (As I had previously described, the visibly cleanest and most reflection-free measurements had been the ones taken with panels surrounding the measurement microphone, but I found that very early arriving reflections from the panels themselves caused significant differences in the calibration profiles for the two speakers, which worsened in proportion to the duration of the truncation window. The same held true for the measurements taken with panels surrounding the speakers, to a slightly lesser degree but coupled with increased pickup of room reflections. Recall, btw, that I did not have the panels in precisely the same positions when I measured the two speakers, which fortuitously led to me discover the significance of the early arriving panel reflections).

Also, I should mention that when I performed the measurements even though I had pillows and a folded back (double thickness) Persian rug on the floor between the speaker and the mic, the waveforms captured by DEQX for all of the measurements clearly show a significant floor reflection (as can be determined based on its arrival time, beginning a little under 3 ms after the direct sound arrival). There is also evidence of a ceiling reflection arriving a little under 8 ms after the direct sound arrival, although it appears likely to consist mainly of low frequencies that I'm not addressing in the speaker calibrations.

Although all three of the new profiles sounded reasonably good, ultimately I was not satisfied with any of them. Most notably on classical solo piano, where the presentation had a slightly mechanical quality, and a slight loss of definition in the mid-treble, that were not present in bypass mode.

Given all of that, what I've decided to do is to order a third double-section acoustic panel and then re-do the speaker measurements. This time I will place one panel up against the fireplace you can see along the left wall in my system description photos; one panel up against the antique radio/phono console on the right; and one panel on the floor between the mic and the speaker being measured (positioned once again in the center of the room). In my circumstances it is reflections from the sides and the floor, and possibly the ceiling, that appear to be the main concerns. I believe that moving the speaker being measured to the center of the room gets them far enough away from the front and rear walls to allow those reflections to be windowed out without significant compromise to the calibrations.

Apologies for the slow progress to those who may be awaiting the conclusions of this adventure. I haven't even begun to address room correction yet. But from my perspective the slow progress has not been bothersome, as what I have in bypass mode and with one or two of the correction profiles is already better than what I had previously (which in turn I was pretty satisfied with). And it's been an interesting learning experience.

Best regards,
-- Al